|
An article you recently created, Novakid, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, click the Submit the draft for review! button atop the article. Silikonz💬 16:00, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- The text I added is different from the one you are referring to. I have added about 30 links from various independent sources. This service already works in various countries and is a well-known tool. What exactly did you not like about my text? Yuri K (talk) 21:17, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Bitrix24 (June 22)
edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bitrix24 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Yuri K!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! - RichT|C|E-Mail 00:24, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
|
Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Bitrix24
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Bitrix24, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. - RichT|C|E-Mail 00:24, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Welcome!
editHello, Yuri K, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.
I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.
To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.
One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)
In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.
Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Best practices for editors with close associations
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:57, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
More
editI can't see where you have responded to my previous message.
- you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
- Contrary to what you said, most of your text is unsourced, and the few refs you did give included reviews and interviews with the company, rather than genuine indepednent third-party sources. Notability doesn't depend on what people think of it.
- You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
- Much of your text appears to be pure promo, eg Its flexible software provides a powerful range of tools for businesses that aid productivity, communication and management... to help businesses of all sizes manage their projects and tasks, communicate effectively, and improve productivity... grew rapidly, expanding its customer base, and continuing to add new features to its software... The company continues to innovate and improve its software, adding new features and integrations to meet the evolving needs of its customers. unsourced, fact-free and shameless spam, and there is a bucket-load more of it.
- You have a whole section on supposed awards, all unreffed, without a wikilink to the award, and with your comment eg A well-thought-out CRM service that can handle just about anything you throw at it
- You have a whole section of cherry-picked reviews when there shouldn't be any, not what notability depends on, just looks like spam, confirmed by your own comments Each iteration of Bitrix24 has been received well... the 2012 release saw positive reviews ... The latest versions also received much positive acclaim
- Your external links should be to the software main site, not to more spam and reviews
- There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
- Your text is littered with junk links to even more reviews and other stuff
- You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
- I didn't check, so much spam that copyright infringements are irrelevant.
Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:52, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
January 2024
edit Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Bitrix24 CRM, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to Draft:Bitrix24 CRM where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. - RichT|C|E-Mail 14:04, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Bitrix24 CRM has a new comment
edit
Your submission at Articles for creation: Bitrix24 CRM (April 5)
edit - If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bitrix24 CRM and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
April 2024
edit
Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:
- Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
- State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
- Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.
- I am writing an article about a significant object, an article about which already exists in other languages on Wikipedia. If you block me, it means you don't think these articles in other languages are meaningful. On what basis did you determine the insignificance of the object?
Yuri K (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I translated an article about an object that has already been added to Wikipedia Yuri K (talk) 07:30, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Other language Wikipedia are separate projects, with their own policies, and what is acceptable there is not necessarily acceptable here. This request does not address the reason for the block, undisclosed paid editing. See WP:PAID. 331dot (talk) 09:13, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.