Welcome!

edit

Hello, ZUKAGRAD, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Equipment of the Georgian Army have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  Lklundin (talk) 12:13, 12 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of weapons used by Georgian MIA, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages PSS, Makarov and PSM. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 14 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Royal Bhutan Army, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages M16A2 and G3. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 2 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

May 2017

edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to FGM-148 Javelin, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 21:59, 3 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Equipment of the Georgian Army, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 22:00, 3 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Georgian SAMs

edit

Literaly none are confirmed by any official or inofficial statement. Unless you have some recent information that states or proves the acquirement of either one of those systems, it's not a fact and I'm growing tired of correcting that section all the time. I am aware of those, they are dated sources that claim a loan taken from France and afew other things merely on speculative level, however absolutly zero confirmation on any systems bought. ad

Edit: in fact there is not even proper assumption which systems exactly have been / are being considered in the first place. More speculations. Why don't you just wait till there is even a remote confirmation by anyone .... ?

best regards TheMightyGeneral (talk) 13:39, 14 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

The best source i can provide to you right now is SIPRI
http://armstrade.sipri.org/armstrade/page/trade_register.php
you can check arms trading between France and Georgia, it says Crotale SAMs, Ground Master-200 radar, and VT-1 missles for SAMs
However those Systems were not delivered yet and ill wait until they get delivered, then ill add them to GAF equipment page.
thanks for corrections on GAF equipment page by the way.


I see. Nice little source anyway. That seems to be the first batch in accordance to the first agreement signed in 2015. But yes I'd wait till there is confirmation of those systems delivery and also there were 2 other contracts signed so most of it is still on speculative basis for now. It should also be noted that MOD officials openly expressed displeasure about such information leaking in the first place. That's another reason why I keep from adding them pre-maturely. Thank you for your contribution as well ZUKAGRAD. Very appreciated. Best regards TheMightyGeneral (talk) 10:04, 15 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Armed Forces of Equatorial Guinea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page APC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 9 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello, ZUKAGRAD. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, List of Equipment used by Georgian Ministry of Internal Affairs, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Ravenswing 11:30, 31 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, ZUKAGRAD. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Active Members ./. wikipedians with this scope

edit

Hi ZUKAGRAD, i had a look to members of this projekt. Regrettably, you're one of the few actually active wikipedians with this scope as I've found by your edits. Maybe you find some pleasure in watching this discussion. Best regards --80.187.109.37 (talk) 11:48, 6 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello there, thanks for contacting and sharing such an great matterial, looks really interesting and promising, i will look them up. thanks once again, best regards ZUKAGRAD (talk) 12:04, 6 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, ZUKAGRAD. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

SVT-40

edit

I undid your edit. I did not see any references to "Tokarev" or "SVT" in the given page. Maybe you did want to link another page?--Le Petit Chat (talk) 22:30, 15 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

oops, i think you are right, wrong link, will correct. -- User:ZUKAGRAD

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited AZP S-60, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gori (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:32, 16 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Gaumarjos

edit
  Blabla
Discordze damimate Kartvelian#4588 KoliaGeorgian (talk) 14:24, 12 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Right side of AMD-65.jpg listed for discussion

edit
 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Right side of AMD-65.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Yann (talk) 09:56, 13 October 2023 (UTC)Reply