Zacharyalanstewart

November 2017

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Nike timeline. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 04:28, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

I gather you don't like Bowerman, and you're making sure it's evident in your edits to the encyclopedia? Please read WP:SOAP and WP:COATRACK - you appear to be placing your personal opinions into articles. Acroterion (talk) 04:29, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

I have no personal feeling about Bowerman. I am simply passionate about ACCURATE information. Due to your normative and pro-corporate editing practices, many of the articles you have been involved with have inaccurate and/or slanted information. This is where people come for information that has NOT been bought and paid for. This trust relationship breaks down when an administrator like yourself, who HAS been bought and paid for short-circuits the ability of conscientious people to edit entries. Zacharyalanstewart (talk) 21:20, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Accusing another editor of being an undisclosed paid editor is a very serious charge and is not acceptable unless you present solid evidence. You have not done so. You say you are passionate about accuracy but you are using garbage blog sources that violate our reliable source requirements. In addition, you are editorializing in what ought to be neutral encyclopedia articles. These behaviors are unacceptable and you must abandon them if you want to keep editing. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 21:40, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

It is also quite disturbing that the content of the article in question does not correspond to historical information released by Nike or the Onitsuka company. Acroterion should not be deleting edits without first checking the veracity of the content itself. That kind of willfully ignorant editing perpetuates false information. Acroterion did not question my sources or the information in the article. I respect that Cullen328 did so. It is a minimum requirement of intellectual honesty that one actually digests the information at hand before despoiling it. Zacharyalanstewart (talk) 21:57, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

"Historical information released by Nike or the Onitsuka company" would be primary sources, and usage of such sources should be kept to a minimum, and should include nothing self-serving. See WP:SELFPUB. Well written Wikipedia articles are based mostly on what reliable, independent sources say about the topic. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 00:43, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Cullen, you seem to have misread my previous post.

Then, please clarify what you meant to say. Thank you. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 06:53, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eric Dadourian (April 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by I dream of horses was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eric Dadourian and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Eric Dadourian, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I dream of horses ^{(talk) (contribs)} _{Remember to {{ping}} me after replying off my talk page} 07:40, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Zacharyalanstewart! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! I dream of horses (talk) (contribs) Remember to {{ping}} me after replying off my talk page 07:40, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Eric Dadourian

Hello, Zacharyalanstewart. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Eric Dadourian".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 14:08, 12 October 2020 (UTC)