Zahra Bkh

Zahra Bkh, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Zahra Bkh! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mustafa(pbuh) Science and Technology Foundation (July 8)

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mustafa(pbuh) Science and Technology Foundation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mustafa(pbuh) Science and Technology Foundation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 21:45, 8 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mustafa Science and Technology Foundation (August 5)

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Mustafa Science and Technology Foundation instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion.

If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

This draft is written from the viewpoint of the organization, focusing on what the organization says about itself. Corporate notability or organization notability is based on what independent reliable sources have written about the subject.

Not every organization, and not every organization with 501(c)(3) status (or its equivalent in other countries) is notable, and this draft does not establish organizational notability. You may ask for advice about organizational notability at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mustafa Science and Technology Foundation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mustafa Science and Technology Foundation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 14:31, 5 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Zahra Bkh! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Article gets moved to draft, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 9 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Mustafa(pbuh) Science and Technology Foundation

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, Zahra Bkh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mustafa(pbuh) Science and Technology Foundation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:54, 9 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mustafa Science and Technology Foundation (April 15)

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Worldbruce was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Mustafa Prize. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The Mustafa Prize is notable, and we have a stand alone article about it. The draft fails to show that the foundation that awards the prize is notable. Its content about the foundation is based on non-independent sources: the foundation's website, a press release by a partner organization, and the website of the prize. Reviewer McClenon describes the problem exactly when he writes, "This draft is written from the viewpoint of the organization, focusing on what the organization says about itself." Only independent sources containing significant coverage of the foundation can show that it is notable. The bulk of the draft should be based on what arms length secondary sources say about the organization. The draft's only independent sources are entirely about the Mustafa Prize, and don't mention the foundation at all. Independent sources in Farsi that briefly mention the foundation don't shed much light on it. BBC Persian calls it part of the Khadem al-Mustafa Community.[1] Deutsche Welle Persian calls it a government foundation.[2] Searches in English find some primary source press releases about STEP and the Noor Student Competition that were picked up and republished by various news organizations, but nothing truly independent. The foundation is only three years old, so it may be too soon for much to have been written about it. The best course of action would be to improve the existing coverage of the foundation within the article about the prize. Then in a few years, after more has been written about the foundation in independent sources, a stand alone article about it could be spun out of the article about the prize.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mustafa Science and Technology Foundation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mustafa Science and Technology Foundation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Worldbruce (talk) 14:24, 15 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Mustafa Science and Technology Foundation

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, Zahra Bkh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mustafa Science and Technology Foundation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 26 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic