Zaragourji

Speedy deletion nomination of RSDRF

A tag has been placed on RSDRF, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Hairhorn (talk) 00:28, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

{{hangon}}

I am planning to add more references and more information. Thank you.

Proposed deletion of RSDRF

The article RSDRF has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable fee paid at a technical school with no wiki entry. Cut and paste entry, presumably a copyvio. Unnecessary entry, not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hairhorn (talk) 10:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

No Violation. The author of this entry is the author of the RSDRF. Also, the key person at the institution. It is an important entry because many ask about RSDRF and its also a good idea for other schools.

Gurnick Academy of Medical Arts

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Gurnick Academy of Medical Arts, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.medacademy.org/about-us. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:17, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Gurnick Academy of Medical Arts

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Gurnick Academy of Medical Arts, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.medacademy.org/about-us. As a copyright violation, Gurnick Academy of Medical Arts appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Gurnick Academy of Medical Arts has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Gurnick Academy of Medical Arts and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) and CC-BY-SA, under CC-BY-SA, or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Gurnick Academy of Medical Arts with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Gurnick Academy of Medical Arts.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. XXX antiuser 18:25, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Please see my explanations Zara Gourji 18:29, 14 August 2009 (UTC)Zaragourji

Conflict of Interest

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. There is good advice on editing with a conflict of interest at User:Uncle G/On notability#Writing about subjects close to you. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 08:20, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

If you return, you must disclose your employment on your user page

Hello Zaragourji. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Zaragourji. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Zaragourji|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:51, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Another employee of Gurnick Academy of Medical Arts has indicated that a previous attempt at an article was done by a firm hired by the Gurnick Academy. If you take any other action besides disclosing your employment, it will be taken as a sign that you are not interested in complying with our terms of use. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:51, 4 September 2018 (UTC)