Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sol Badguy Image 2.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Sol Badguy Image 2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:28, 20 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ky Kiske Image 2.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Ky Kiske Image 2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:28, 20 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

about BlazBlue: Calamity Trigger

edit

I've found the same text on http://round1ko.com/?p=875 , http://keepyourselfalive.wordpress.com/2008/11/12/blazblue-calamity-trigger-a-closer-look-at-the-characters/ , http://www.rpgdreamersforum.com/index.php?showtopic=56870 , http://startits.wordpress.com/2008/01/24/new-2d-fighter-from-arc-system-works/ and http://forums.bleachportal.net/showthread.php?t=53998 . But when I looked closer I found that most or all of them took it from Wikipedia instead of we taking it from them. Even if it wasn't stolen I would still have to deleted it since it's full of bias and trivia. And I see your newish here, and I just want to tell you to don't forget to sign all your post by typing four tildes after your post.--Megaman en m (talk) 08:19, 18 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

BlazBlue: Calamity Trigger characters

edit

Hey, I'm the guy who keeps putting the notability tag on your articles. The reason is that as they stand right now, the characters aren't notable enough to warrent their own articles. The notability guideline states that references have to be "independent from the subject"... which means to get information about characters, they need to come from sources like IGN, or GameSpot. A list of sources can be found at WP:VG/RS -- you can't use fansites or anything like that.

The problem with the character articles are that they're for characters that have only been in two games -- granted, the console one has received great reviews, but that doesn't mean that each character needs its own article. Only when characters have gotten reception on their own can they have their own article... for example, Mario has a lot of coverage. Some video game characters that are even the title characters of their own franchises don't have their own articles -- take for instance Banjo (Banjo-Kazooie) -- it re-directs to the series article.

Do you still feel that the characters need their own articles? -- Nomader (Talk) 06:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of Ragna the Bloodedge

edit

I have nominated Ragna the Bloodedge, Jin Kisaragi, Noel Vermillion, and Arakune, all articles that you created, for deletion. I do not think that these article satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ragna the Bloodedge. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the articles to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Nomader (Talk) 07:20, 29 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re:Deletion of Pro's

edit

Hey, it's nothing personal -- when I first started out on Wikipedia, a lot of my articles were deleted too. The problem is, the notability guideline states that sources for an article must be "independent of the subject" and the official website isn't independent. It's the only source for most of these character articles that are better expanded on the main game's page -- either way, if you still disagree with me (and possibly hate me, sorry about that), you can feel free to join the discussion yourself and defend your articles. -- Nomader (Talk) 17:04, 29 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

But you see -- that's the problem. The characters on their own aren't notable enough for their own article. Even in world-famous games which are totally based on story like Final Fantasy X, the characters don't have their own seperate articles.
What's needed more than the characters for the Blazblue article is that it needs to conform to other video game articles. A good base line would be to have...
  • A gameplay section: what kind of game is it? How does it play? Talk about what special powers are and what they do in general. Write this like you were trying to explain the game to your mother -- infer that the reader has no idea what you're talking about.
  • A plot section: -- this is what you seem to enjoy writing the most -- Talk about the story of the game. Don't talk about their special overdrives A developmenreception section: what did critics like IGN and GameSpot think of the game?
  • A development section: Talk about how the game was developed. Say when it first started development, and talk about what different reliable websites (again like IGN, GameSpot and GameSpy) thought about them in previews.
  • A reception section: Look up the reviews for the games and see what people thought about it. Did they like the sound design? The story? The gameplay? What were their criticisms?
Notice that characters aren't even mentioned in what I noted above -- they should be worked into the plot section in normal writing. Again, see Final Fantasy X for a good example of this. Sorry if this is a bit overly complicated -- but if you need any help developing the article, I'll see if I can find some time to lend a hand. -- Nomader (Talk) 18:23, 29 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

June 2009

edit

  The recent edit you made to BlazBlue: Calamity Trigger constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 17:23, 29 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits

edit

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 17:53, 29 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (File:Arakune.jpg)

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Arakune.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 10:21, 20 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (File:Jin Kisaragi.jpg)

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Jin Kisaragi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 23:01, 21 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (File:Noel Vermillion.jpg)

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Noel Vermillion.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 07:21, 22 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (File:Ragna the Bloodedge.jpg)

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Ragna the Bloodedge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 20:50, 22 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply