Zero077

Welcome!

Hello, Zero077, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions have removed content without an explanation. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and how to develop articles
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• Article wizard for creating new articles
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 18:05, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

American English

Your changes did not seem very useful. And now, you have started an edit-warring. If you feel the information is inaccurate, please discuss it on the talk page and/or leave the tag {{dubious}} by the supposively inaccurate information.LakeKayak (talk) 19:51, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Note that I added the {{expand section}} to the section Inland North. But length is not the issue. The section gather ideas, but it fails to parse them even briefly. That's the issue.LakeKayak (talk) 19:08, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Zero077, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Zero077! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 21:55, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

May 2017

Hello. There is a discussion on WP:DRN involving an issue which may have some relevance to you. You are free to visit the page and put your two bits in. In the mean time, however, it must be agreed that neither party edit the page.LakeKayak (talk) 02:06, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

What does edit war mean? It was agree by two others that the tag was not needed. I also waited 8 days after the conversation started to edit that off. Zero077 (talk) 02:12, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Did you even read the page WP:AVOIDEDITWAR? That will give you your answer. Either way, I can no longer argue on this page. If you have anything else to say, you are welcome to put in your two cents on WP:Dispute Resolution Noticeboard.LakeKayak (talk) 02:19, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

It's not and edit war when 2 others agreed with me. It was 3 against 1 that the section was fine and didn't need a tag added. I will contact and admin to get this resolved. Zero077 (talk) 02:21, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Contacting a moderator was the reason why I took the issue to WP:Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. There you yourself will be able to state the dispute in your own perspective and a moderator will be able to resolve the issue based off the analysis of what everyone has said.

Also, I think I should say this. I've been hold it back long enough. As the two user who have the support of, joined within the last month, I saw them as potentially your own little puppets. I have already stated my previous issue with the three brand new users on the page North American English regional phonology who also just didn't like the content of the page. Here, I was under the impression that you just liked the section as was.

For what is worth, I thought that the talk page said the initial tag was misleading. So, I replaced it with another tag which could state my real issue more clearly.LakeKayak (talk) 16:44, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/G-Zay, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Mr KEBAB (talk) 15:31, 19 August 2017 (UTC)