Zerodarkfortynine

October 2017

Your recent editing history at James Hamilton Academy shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. General Ization ^Talk 21:49, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Zerodarkfortynine reported by User:General Ization (Result: ). Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 21:53, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at James Hamilton Academy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Nthep (talk) 22:20, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

I'll be very clear about this, I was close to making this block indefinite on the basis that your edits are just vandalism but I've given you the benefit of the doubt and blocked you for a week for the edit-warring and repeatedly adding unsourced content. Nthep (talk) 22:28, 11 October 2017 (UTC)