User talk:Zh3538/articledraft

Peer review by Aennis15: Hey Zh3538

Good job in your contribution to the woodpecker finch article. The content that was added to this article was appropriate and relevant to the topic. The structure of the content organized. The behaviour subsections are well developed and deepens the readers knowledge of the specific tool use behaviour. There are some very minor grammatical errors and there are some sentences that I found slightly confusing however overall it is good. The content that has been added is consistently backed up by reliable scientific literature. The article also seems to be presented in a relatively neutral tone.

An aspect, that would need improvement would be the lead hand. Personally, I do not think the lead reflects the essential elements of the article. You gave a good summary of what a woodpecker finch is and their important characteristics, however, the lead does not reflect on the content that has been added about the behaviour of the Woodpeckers Finch. Adding a few sentences that reflect the material that has been added to the article will give the audience a better understanding of what they will be reading.

Overall, a great start to your contribution. Just some minor changes to be made in the lead hand. I am looking forward to seeing the final product. Aennis15 (talk) 13:08, 2 November 2019 (UTC)