Zhenghecaris

Welcome!

Hi Zhenghecaris! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:43, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zirabgtaria (October 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Killarnee was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zirabgtaria and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Killarnee (talk) 23:02, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Sorry,but I was not able to find much information about Zirabagtaria. Zhenghecaris (talk) 11:45, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Zhenghecaris! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Killarnee (talk) 23:02, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zirabgtaria (October 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zirabgtaria and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:41, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Honestly, I cannot find many more sources,but I will try to add more . Zhenghecaris (talk) 13:17, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

We don't need to see many sources, but they do need to be a) published and b) reliable. Whatever "d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net" is, it doesn't seem to satisfy either of these requirements, and isn't therefore a valid source. Also, more than one source is usually required. Wherever you got this information from, you need to cite that source. And you need to cite it correctly; see WP:REFB for advice. HTH, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:25, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

My source is supposed to be reliable,it is the pdf of a book. Zhenghecaris (talk) 14:35, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Okay, then you need to cite that book, not some random URL, as your source. In the case of offline sources such as books (assuming no online version exists – if one does, then please cite that) it's important to provide sufficient bibliographical detail to enable the source to be reliably identified for verification purposes; see WP:OFFLINE for advice. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:43, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Okay I did it. Zhenghecaris (talk) 16:03, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Korifogrammia (October 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Korifogrammia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:42, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Korifogrammia (October 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Korifogrammia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:59, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zirabgtaria (October 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zirabgtaria and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:00, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Did you view the sources? Zhenghecaris (talk) 16:02, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

You can verify it by going to the library at AMNH and read the book. Zhenghecaris (talk) 18:00, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

October 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Houcaris, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 05:54, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zirabgtaria (October 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NotAGenious was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zirabgtaria and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

NotAGenious (talk) 12:30, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

That is because barely anyone wants to study it , for the original description read the book deep time analysis a coherent view of the history of life. Zhenghecaris (talk) 13:30, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

Plus all sources are from Mark Mcmenamin. Zhenghecaris (talk) 14:11, 4 October 2024 (UTC)