Zkc28
October 2011
edit
Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on Herman Cain presidential campaign, 2012. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.
Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:
- Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:09, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
Sorry. I was not meaning to start an editing war. I was attempting to remove a statement that had a bias and did not represent the facts truthfully. The source was also unreliable. As you stated, "it needs a better source than thinkprogress". A story should have a reliable source before you add it to wikipedia, not after. See Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. However it looks like someone is trying to resolve the problem.Zkc28 (talk) 14:42, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexandria (talk) 15:29, 29 October 2011 (UTC)