February 2014

edit

  Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Yunshui. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 17:33, 9 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Favonian (talk) 17:43, 9 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ZobbGoSorm (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Why was this account given an instant block, please give me a full detailed explanation, I will not accept brief, half-assed reasons such as Vandalism.

Decline reason:

If you can explain your edits, please do so here; otherwise, we have little choice but to consider them vandalism. --jpgordon::==( o ) 18:00, 9 February 2014 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Comment for reviewing admin

Please have a look at Special:DeletedContributions/ZobbGoSorm. Favonian (talk) 17:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC)Reply