Zombie Hunter Smurf

Vandalism

This user talk page has been vandalized 6 times.

Your name

Just a short note, utterly unimportant to you probably, but I just have to say that your username is the first one I've seen on Wikipedia that almost made me choke on my drink. From laughing, that is. Brilliant one. Take care, cheers,  Channel ®    22:51, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you, I thought it was quite amusing myself. I also must say I enjoyed reading about your fights against vandals on your talk page, keep up the good work on that. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 01:56, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Point of Divergence

Good point on the APA. I know the editor (who is still around), and was not aware that either the APA is defunct, or the website is grossly neglected. (It does show up on websearches; should we incorporate a past-tense reference to it?) --Orange Mike | Talk 13:47, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

OK. I was mostly thinking about it in terms of disambiguation. (Full disclosure: I always feel a little guilty for not participating in it when I was invited to do so, although I'm an SF fan and full-bore history geek.) --Orange Mike | Talk 14:06, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Jim's an old friend of mine; I contacted him and he made the additions and corrections that you then expanded upon. I've urged him to update his website with more current information, since the current editors have none of their own. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:42, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Alien Space Bats

Not particularly, although I'm currently writing a non-AH story about ASBs. Shsilver (talk) 04:29, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

I personally don't consider it a major enough trope to be included in the AH entry. Others have entered it in the past and it has been deleted as unreferenced. If you want to enter it somewhere, go ahead and see what happens. Shsilver (talk) 12:01, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Zombies

About the Zombies on a plane... they were still dead, weren't they? :p jk

I dig what you are saying and it is one of those genres that'll have a million D-grade, shot-with-dad's-handicam-style movies made but just about all of them have one of those criteria. Just like most good Z-films won't actually use the word Zombie (Shaun of the Dead was the exception and they made a joke specifically about this trait.

btw, Kudos to you for keeping the Smurf vill safe from the undead! :)

(Bobbo9000 (talk) 00:55, 12 June 2008 (UTC))

Well... they sorta don't need to conform to all three; I've just noticed that nearly all Zed films have at least one of those elements, because there'll be films from the 1930s and earlier where they'll be dead, but not carnivorous and so on. And I've learned not to get into an argument with a die hard Zombie fan... :)

Damn... really wish I thought of your name now! At least I know the handle I'm gonna be using next time I play CoD4! :p —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobbo9000 (talk • contribs) 09:26, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Emberverse!

Dude, you weren't kidding. This is fairly complete as is.

Excellent work. I will add in some extra details as I spot the need for them, but so far, this is superb! Saralleine (talk) 16:35, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Scourge of God

Hi Zombie. Just finished re-reading SoG and I can't find the ref to cheerleaders going into battle at all. Could it be you've misunderstood chapter four where it says: "but at least today they didn’t have those cheerleaders in short skirts leaping and cavorting and making pyramids in front of the troops. She’d always hated that, particularly on serious occasions." Surely this refers to a formal reception like the one given to Mike and Signe Harvel in MaC? Cheers - Galloglass 23:31, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Zombie you've done such excellent work with the article I feel it would be churlish of me to remove it. Obviously we have different interpretations of the meaning but if you are happy with it I'm quite content to leave it in. Cheers - Galloglass 14:19, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Gray Victory

Oh, there are so many reasons for being hostile to the book by its subject:

1. Speculative history always seems to me to be a waste, unless it is written as a way to emphasize the actual history. Thus, that alternate history book where the Ottomans didn't turn back at Florence is useful, because what it actually ends up doing is emphasizing the importance of the real events. I have yet to detect, even in Harry Turtledove, the same use/impulse in the Civil War alternatives.
2. South Wins is the easiest of the alternatives to get wrong, and insultingly wrong, and stupidly wrong, of any that I have seen. There are 100 ways to go wrong and no way to go right. From the dreadful, stultifying C.S.A.: The Confederate States of America, which had slavery in the 20th century, to the Southern apologist shaded ones, there's just no way to do it. Either the authors assume that the war was "about" slavery or that slavery was "ending on its own" at the time, and, either way, the result is a horrible insult to every human of intelligence.
3. My biggest gripe: the fans. The fans of this kind of thing, I think, betray a certain Millerite dissatisfaction with the world as it is. They seem to long for "the day." Well, that day was pretty rotten, and in the Civil War both sides were wrong, both were right, and both had horrors to conceal, and anyone who longs for the hoop skirts is as creepy to me as someone who longs for the Mammies and Uncles. Someone who longs for "States Rights" is as worrisome to me, because I wonder why those persons want only to reminisce about the days of the 1860, instead of the days of the Articles of Confederation, when the U.S. had "states rights" and no nation. Why don't they fondly write about "What if Alexander Hamilton had been strangled in his crib?"

I just sense this amazing amount of sublimation in the writing, reading, and fandom of that kind of book. I know that it can be noble, but, well, it seems more suspect than people who want to join the SCA. I don't want to insult masses of people I've never met, but it's a genre that gives me the screaming phantods. Utgard Loki (talk) 16:46, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Oops, I see that you are a fan of the genre. Sorry. It really does bug me, though. I don't mean a personal insult. Utgard Loki (talk) 16:47, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar and tsars

You Deserved the Barnstar you've shown all the attributes that makes wikipedia great, and have been a positive force on the world war z article. As for the Tsar thing if you reread the chapter will the priest he and the interviewer still refer to the head of the russian state as the president, he asked if he feels its appropriate for the president to be head of the church. i feel the comparsion to the tsars is more an analogy thats why she says do you know what the word for caeser is in russian if he'd been made tsar there'd be no need for ambiguity, its like when people claim george bush has given himself the powers of a king. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.27.231.231 (talk) 22:21, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

297 bottom of the page it starts with the question about the religious doctrine being perverted for political ends, then says about the president declaring himself head of the church. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.27.231.231 (talk) 14:52, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Fair enough, I don't really want to interfere with someone else interpretation because how we each imagine any book is personal, but i just don't feel there's any actually proof russia became a monarchy i was thinking it was more like Iran. i'd like to see the picture of Yonkers but i'm not sure about the notability, ask Man in Black. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.27.231.231 (talk) 21:19, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Nantucket series

Hi, thanks for the invitation, I'll look it over. What's wrong with linking Odysseus to Odikweos? AnyPerson (talk) 00:32, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Oh, okay, thanks for the explanation. I didn't really do much, though.  :) AnyPerson (talk) 01:39, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Cool

Just dropped by from the WWIII talk page to say, that that is one awsome name! You made an excellent choice there my friend. Also I have killed over two and a half million zombies, but only two of which were in Russia; and I only found them while I was Hitchiking from London,(were I had just taken down a bunch of troublesome zombie dogs, who destroyed my brand new Aston Martin)to New Zealand to kill a few Shapeshifters that were planning an assasination. Goodbye cool sounding name person. --'The Ninjalemming' 18:24, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar

Thanks for the award and I'd like to dedicate it to all the other editors because it was a team effort and without them it ouldn't have been possible ;) (Emperor (talk) 00:59, 18 January 2009 (UTC))

Capricon

If you plan on attending Capricon next month, stop by a panel and introduce yourself.Shsilver (talk) 23:40, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Counterfactual history

What is the notability guideline for external links? Personally, I don't have any emotional attachment to the Kalmar Union link, I was just trying to help out a new editor who didn't know where to put his link or how to do it. I'll respect your decision if it is supported by other editors of the article or by WP policy and guidelines. And I would honestly appreciate your rationale. Thanks! Wilhelm_meis (talk) 03:53, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. I hadn't seen the ELNO guidelines before, so I learned something today. I understand your point about swamping the article with links to forums & discussions. So far, I've just been pretty much going by which links are representative of the topic, rather than a specific set of guidelines like WP:ELNO. I will definitely keep these guidelines in mind in the future. Wilhelm_meis (talk) 18:49, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

World War Z

Hi Zombie,

Couldn't help but notice that you deleted my comments about references to Roxy Music, Iron Maiden and Johnny Clegg in War World Z. Why? Sure, I didn't cited the exact page numbers but they are all there in the book and are part of what gives it its authentic feel? Mark —Preceding unsigned comment added by MarkAllenby (talk • contribs) 14:19, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your message regarding 'notability'. I will try and redraft and see if it works better this time. Mark —Preceding unsigned comment added by MarkAllenby (talk • contribs) 11:54, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

I have tried again to make points that I think are relevant, but they may still be deleted unless someone can strengthen them up to the required standard. If they do I feel it will be a shame because the use of cultural references in World War Z is more than trivia, it is an important litery device that greatly adds to the effectiveness of the book. Once again, thanks for the feedback. Mark

The WikiProject Novels Newsletter - March 2009

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:14, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Films

Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's film-related articles. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining WikiProject Films? We are a group of editors dedicated to improving the overall quality of Wikipedia's film-related content. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of participants. We also have a number of regional and topical task forces that you may be interested in joining as well. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! —Erik (talk • contrib) 17:55, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

World War Z

I assume you'll keep us Wikipedians posted via the article if sources start to cover further developments on the film adaptation's production process. :P Cirt (talk) 13:09, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Gore Counterfactual in External Links

Here is a link to a paper I tried listing under "addtional reading" in Counterfactual History. You mentioned in your comments (after deleting the entry) that it might be more appropriate under external links. Here is a link to the paper:

http://www.cdfai.org/PDF/President%20Al%20Gore%20and%20the%202003%20Iraq%20War%20A%20Counterfactual%20Critique%20of%20Conventional%20Wisdom.pdf —Preceding unsigned comment added by FPHDal (talk • contribs) 17:03, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

World War Z

You comments on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Novels/Peer review should have been fixed now. :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 14:21, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations on the good article, which is almost entirely down to your hard and conscientious work I hearby award you

Good luck on working to towards a featured article, if there's anything i can do to help don't hesitate to contact me on my talk pageSherzo (talk) 01:21, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Boundaries of alternate history

Just so you know, the reason this section was added was because there is an editor who keeps insisting that any science fiction story which was set in the future when written and is now set in the past is alternate history. If you look through the archives, you'll find earlier discussions. If you want to include the information that no, that isn't ah with a citation, you can cite an article I published in Helix SF back in July 2006. Shsilver (talk) 14:33, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

I'll give it some thought. Obviously, I didn't want to add the cite to the article I wrote since so many people would find that self-serving. :) Shsilver (talk) 14:38, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Days Gone Bye

I have nominated Days Gone Bye, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Days Gone Bye. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. DreamGuy (talk) 22:25, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Apocalyptic Zombie games

I disagree with you edits, first full games are more notable than fan mods, second they are apocalyptic within the confines of the town or city they take place in, There's no evidence within the Call of Duty or Left for Dead that its a global apocalypse. Sherzo (talk) 18:55, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

the existence of an article on wikipedia is no basis for an argument, if we take your argument that localised apocalypse aren't to be included then 28 days later which is about an event entirely limited to Britain shouldn't be there. On the matter of notability Dead Rising has 83,500 ghits when combined with zombie apocalypse game zombie master one of the 2 mods you feel are more notable only 1,120, further a mod isn't actually a game its a modification to an existing game as such its that game that should be listed with the mods as secondary notes, given these factors I feel that the examples of 2 well known and successful games is of more use to the article than 2 obscure mods. Sherzo (talk) 19:24, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Novels - Coordinator Election

Hello. To begin, every member of WikiProject Novels will be getting this message (the joy of macros) so if you wish to get in touch with me, please post a message on my talk page. I would encourage anyone who so wishes, to stand in the Coordinator Elections. If you wish to stand, please do so by 23:59pm, June 27. Voting will the continue to 23:59pm, July 21. Can everyone please check-out the Coordinator Elections page. Also, the collaboration of the month is The Tin Drum, so if you have any spare time, please check it out. And I apologise to the seven of you for whom this will be a repeat message. Regards, Alan16 (talk).

Coordinator Election

Hello. The Coordiantor Election has begun. All members are encouraged to vote by the deadline, July 28. To vote simply add support to the comments and questions for.. section of the member of your choice.

3 users are standing:

• Alan16 (talk · contribs)
• Kevinalewis (talk · contribs)
• Pmlinediter (talk · contribs)

Regards, Alan16 (talk) 19:45, 29 June 2009 (UTC).

Please warn vandals when you revert

Hello. Regarding the recent revert and several previous ones you made to Alternate history: You may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. When the severity of the warnings ratchets up, the vandal has no complaint that he wasn't properly warned. Thank you. Edison (talk) 18:52, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Regarding changes made to book article

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Lost_Fleet:_Relentless

Sorry for the mistake in placing the citation in there, I'm brand new to this and although I did some reading on some aspects of making editorial changes, I didn't see specifics about placement of citations...obviously I just missed it.

The author of the book "THE LOST FLEET: RELENTLESS", John G. Hemry (aka: Jack Campbell) was aware of my interest in correcting that particular article and asked that I also include the spoiler warning at the beginning of that article.

It too has been removed from the post. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cold Canuck (talk • contribs) 16:18, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

GURPS Infinite Worlds

Just did a major update to the GURPS Infinite Worlds article. You might want to take a look and see what you think.

AH Sandbox

Looks like a good start. I've seen "counterfactual" used intechangably with "alternate history". There's likely some useful Google Scholar hits here. [1] Are there any fiction articles that have reached GA or FA, they'd probably be useful templates for structuring the AH article. Edward321 (talk) 23:38, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

The WikiProject Novels Newsletter - July 2009

The July 2009 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Alan16(talk)

WP:Hornbook -- a new law-related task force for the J.D. curriculum

Hi Zombie Hunter Smurf,

I'm asking Wikipedians who are interested in United States legal articles to take a look at WP:Hornbook, the new "JD curriculum task force".

Our mission is to assimilate into Wikipedia all the insights of an American law school education, by reducing hornbooks to footnotes.

• Each casebook will have a subpage.

• Over the course of a semester, each subpage will shift its focus to track the unfolding curriculum(s) for classes using that casebook around the country.
• It will also feature an extensive, hyperlinked "index" or "outline" to that casebook, pointing to pages, headers, or {{anchors}} in Wikipedia (example).
• Individual law schools can freely adapt our casebook outlines to the idiosyncratic curriculum devised by each individual professor.

• I'm encouraging law students around the country to create local chapters of the club I'm starting at my own law school, "Student WP:Hornbook Editors". Using WP:Hornbook as our headquarters, we're hoping to create a study group so inclusive that nobody will dare not join.

What you can do now:

1. Add WP:Hornbook to your watchlist, {{User Hornbook}} to your userpage, and ~~~~ to Wikipedia:Hornbook/participants.

2. If you're a law student,

• Email http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:Hornbook to your classmates, and tell them to do the same.
• Contact me directly via talk page or email about coordinating a chapter of "Student WP:Hornbook Editors" at your own school.

(You don't have to start the club, or even be involved in it; just help direct me to someone who might.)

3. Introduce yourself to me. Law editors on Wikipedia are a scarce commodity. Do knock on my talk page if there's an article you'd like help on.

Regards, Andrew Gradman ^talk/_WP:Hornbook 02:11, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of World domination

The article World domination has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is strictly original research. No evidence is given that any of the real historical information is related to the topic of "world domination." No references are given for fictional "world domination", or that it has even been discussed in secondary sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Steve Dufour (talk) 01:56, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Novels - Narnia Task Force

Hi! You would be glad to know that a new wikipedia ad has been created by Srinivas to encourage users to join Chronicles of Narnia Task Force. You can display that ad on your user/talk page too using the following code: {{Wikipedia ads|ad=190}}

Wikipedia ads	file info – #190

-- Alan16 (talk) 10:48, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Novels - August 2009 Newsletter

The August 2009 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Alan16 (talk) 17:40, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

WWZ toward FAC

Hey there.. I noticed your request for a peer review of World War Z at the WPNovels page. I'm happy to have a look if you like, but I have to warn you that school is about to start for me, so I may have a sudden severe lack of time on my hands soon. I should add that I haven't read the book myself, but my wife and my next-door neighbor are both big fans.

Obviously (since it passed GA) the article is in good shape; it looks like some spots could use some prose-brushing, which I'm happy to help with. I took a look at the rough draft of character lists you've been working on and I must say that I'm not a big fan of those in articles about novels. We can discuss it further anon.

Anyway, lemme know what you think and I'll block out some time to have a look. Scartol • Tok 20:27, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Hey there.. More than a month later, I've finally finished my copyedit and posted some comments. Sorry for the tremendous delay; I hope my peer review is useful! Good luck and lemme know if you have any questions. Scartol • Tok 18:33, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

List of zombie novels which you contributed to, is currently up for deletion

FYI. Ikip (talk) 08:20, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

I have admired your work from afar for several months now.

Just saw your minor edit on the article, care to comment at the Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List of zombie novels? Ikip (talk) 03:17, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Please explain reverts, especially when source has been provided.

I explained my change to the Max Brooks article and provided a source in which Max said flatly that the book is not tongue-in-cheek. You re-reverted it with no explanation this time. I provided a source and I doubt you'll find something better than Max's own words. When someone has provided a source to explain a change, you really need to explain the revert. (The source went in the edit summary rather than the article only because the summary was about a deletion and the article is about Max, not the book itself.) Doczilla _STOMP! 04:42, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

You are correct. I totally overlooked the part of your edit summary which said the link was dead. Sorry about that. Sorry to hear you're having trouble with the Zombieland article. Best wishes, Doczilla _STOMP! 11:10, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

take over the world

Hi. I've trimmed the article, World conquest. But the above REDIRECTS to it. So I'm merely putting that into the body. --Ludvikus (talk) 21:05, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Hello again. I've responded on the talk page. --Ludvikus (talk) 21:48, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

World Domination update

I've suggested merging World Domination into The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. I know this may sound crazy but please check out the present status of the first article. Discussion is at Talk:The Protocols of the Elders of Zion#Merger proposal. Thanks. Steve Dufour (talk) 14:49, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Jesusland map

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Jesusland map. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesusland map (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:18, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

May 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Zombie Survival Guide. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:27, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

==New WikiProject Novels initiative

We have begun a new initiative at the WikiProject Novels: an improvement drive. As a member listed here, you are being notified. Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Novels#5-5-5 Improvement Drive and Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Collaboration for more details. Also I would like to remind you to keep an eye on the project talk page at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Novels. Thanks, Sadads (talk) 01:47, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Novels Collaboration for February

Thank you everyone who participated in the January Collaboration, it was quite a success with 5 new C class articles, 3 stub kills and several articles were removed from our backlogs. In support of the Great Backlog Drive, the WikiProject Novels Collaboration for February is going to help remove backlog candidates in the backlogs related to WikiProject Novels. Please join us, and help us wikify, reference, clean up plot sections and generally improve Novels content, Sadads (talk) 21:27, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

You are recieving this message because you are a member of WikiProject Novels according to Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Members

Invitation to take part in a pilot study

I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to a short survey. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates only 5 minutes’’’. cooldenny (talk) 18:07, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Naming Conventions?!?

"Zombie Apocalypse" (with the initial caps) is the name of a hypothetical occurence, a TYPE of apocalypse. It's a proper name, and it requires caps. I'm going to switch the articles "Zombie apocalypse" and "Zombie Apocalypse" back the way they were before you messed them up, please refrain from doing so again.

LordEcchi (talk) 17:43, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

You're mistaken, it IS a proper noun, as I have already mentioned. You've changed it to a format that is improper English, makes NO sense whatsoever and looks like crap. Be that as it may, I have no energy to fight you over this (even though you're clearly mistaken), so screw it, put the page however you want, teaching people bad English couldn't possibly be a bad thing. /sarcasm

LordEcchi (talk) 04:48, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Since you apparently want your talk page kept clear I will leave my response here. There is no such thing as a "zombie apocalypse". It is a small sub-genre of fiction, usually a mixture of horror/science fiction. And even apocalyptic scenarios with two words in the titles are usually not both capitalized, such as Nuclear holocaust or Societal collapse. Also I found no source suggesting that the term is a proper noun, and that is because the term does not describe a unique entity (i.e. Zombie Apocalypse (band)) but a class of common entities. But if you honestly believe I am mistaken, than start a discussion on the talk page and see what consensus is. I would respect whatever the decision the editors of the article reach. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 11:14, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Interview

We should be able to set something up, although I'm pretty booked through the end of Worldcon. You can e-mail me directly at my username at sfsite.com. Shsilver (talk) 02:36, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Invitation to look at edits on IQ reference chart

I see the article IQ reference chart has been tagged for expert review since October 2012. As part of a process of drafting a revision of that article in my user sandbox, I am contacting all Wikipedians who have edited that article since early 2009 for whom I can find a user talk page.

I have read all the diffs of all the edits committed to the article since the beginning of 2009 (since before I started editing Wikipedia). I see the great majority of edits over that span have been vandalism (often by I.P. editors, presumably teenagers, inserting the names of their classmates in charts of IQ classifications) and reversions of vandalism (sometimes automatically by ClueBot). Just a few editors have referred to and cited published reliable sources on the topic of IQ classification. It is dismaying to see that the number of reliable sources cited in the article has actually declined over the last few years. To help the process of finding reliable sources for articles on psychology and related topics, I have been compiling a source list on intelligence since I became a Wikipedian in 2010, and I invite you to make use of those sources as you revise articles on Wikipedia and to suggest further sources for the source on the talk pages of the source list and its subpages. Because the IQ reference chart article has been tagged as needing expert attention for more than half a year, I have opened discussion on the article's talk page about how to fix the article, and I welcome you to join the discussion. The draft I have in my user sandbox shows my current thinking about a reader-friendly, well sourced way to update and improve the article. I invite your comments and especially your suggestions of reliable sources as the updating process proceeds. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 20:14, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

File:World War Z contest winner.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:World War Z contest winner.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. damiens.rf 19:27, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Emberverse page

Zombie Hunter Smurf. I am Kier Salmon, Steve's first reader for the Emberverse series. I am not very good at wiki edits yet. I've had other things on my plate to learn and do. I looked at the Emberverse page recently and thought to add to it... but I didn't like the very hard to read colored banners. So I went and looked at other pages that listed series, and they are structured very differently. Would you be OK with my either a) changing the colors to something a little less difficult to read (i.e. more neutral and pallid) or b) changing it completely over to the structure most author series is written in? (look at Mercy Thompson and Patricia Finney for examples of what I mean) Then I could add to the links and bring it up to date through Given Sacrifice.

Since this would be a major change to the page I don't feel comfortable or happy just blasting through and changing it without a go-ahead from you.

Thank you. Communicating with me can happen through kiersalmon@gmail.com also.

Kier SalmonKiersalmon (talk) 20:53, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Featherston.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Featherston.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:17, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Children's War

The article The Children's War has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A work by non-noable author (no article); No RS sources on this book can be found. The article has been marked as a stub since 2000

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:27, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:DtFmap600.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DtFmap600.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:19, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Category:WikiProjects Alternate History listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Category:WikiProjects Alternate History. Since you had some involvement with the Category:WikiProjects Alternate History redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:32, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Featherston.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Featherston.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:57, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Alternate history anime

A tag has been placed on Category:Alternate history anime indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:56, 17 July 2023 (UTC)