Zrosen88

Possibly unfree File:Logo old.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Logo old.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 07:26, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

University of New Haven

Hello, I've reverted all of your edits on this page, as they were copy & pasted off the Internet, which in not allowed on Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia:Copy-paste for more information. I'm happy to chat about this if you would like advice. Best, Markvs88 (talk) 15:10, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Dr. Henry C. Lee, Forensic Scientist.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Dr. Henry C. Lee, Forensic Scientist.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 23:55, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

• It is an insult to Wikipedia to upload a pathetic thumbnail. If the university is prepared to provide a decent resolution image (1000px or more), then upload it to the Commons and take appropriate steps to show that the copyright holder releases it. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:42, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of MuuMuse

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on MuuMuse requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ridernyc (talk) 04:09, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

February 2013

Hello, I'm Eyesnore. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Charger Bulletin, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Eyesnore 21:48, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

• Hi Eyesnore! I didn't notice what you changed - what changed, and can you explain what I did wrong so I'll know better for next time? Cheers, Zrosen88 16:52, 1 February 2013 (ET)

Hi, Zrosen88! It looks like what happend is that User:Eyesnore misclicked while using the anti-vandalism tool WP:Huggle. They undid their reversion of you a few seconds later so it looks like they would agree with me when I say you did not in fact do anything wrong at all. Happy editing! Sophus Bie ^(talk) 02:59, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! Zrosen88 22:03, 1 February 2013 (ET)

You're welcome, and have a good evening! Sophus Bie ^(talk) 03:56, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Welcome

I noticed no one had welcomed you yet, so...

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Zrosen88, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Be Bold!
• Learn from others
• Be kind to others
• Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
• Tell us a bit about yourself
• Our great guide to Wikipedia

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! Sophus Bie ^(talk) 03:03, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Ralph F. DellaCamera Stadium aerial photo.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ralph F. DellaCamera Stadium aerial photo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Paul McDonald (talk) 20:27, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

License tagging for File:UNH circa 1968.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:UNH circa 1968.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Maxcy Hall 1970.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Maxcy Hall 1970.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 02:31, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Image upload

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:President_Steven_H._Kaplan_with_Dr._Henry_C._Lee_and_Sen._Dick_Blumenthal.jpg - hoping I uploaded this correctly with copyright info? I own the photo and am releasing it to Wikimedia Commons ... but the image was taken by someone I hired and has their name. Afraid it will be deleted for someone fearing it was stolen. Any help is greatly appreciated! - Zack Rosen (talk) 21:14, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

You need to ask on Commons, as they have their own rules and procedures. Start at commons:Commons:Upload help. JohnCD (talk) 21:20, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

If you hired someone to take the photo, the copyright is theirs, not yours. You need to get a letter from them releasing the photo under a creative commons license and forward it to the wikimedia foundation. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 21:22, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Temporary Information and Names

Hello, Wikipedians! As a still-amateur editor, I have a question regarding temporary information: specifically, names. If an article about a university refers to their student government, is it appropriate to include the student government's president's name in the article? I lean towards this information not being necessary and, specifically due to its temporary standing (new student government presidents are elected each year), unencyclopedic ... but can someone give me a definitive answer? And/or show me the Wikipedia guideline that explains this? I keep seeing this popup on an article and don't want to delete if it is, in fact, appropriate for Wikipedia. Thanks a bunch! Zack Rosen (talk) 23:09, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

If independent, reliable sources talk about the student government, I don't see why Wikipedia wouldn't talk about it, either. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 23:28, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your advice. I agree with including the student government...yet, the name of the president? What would you say about that? Zack Rosen (talk) 23:52, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

If that specific president is discussed by reliable sources - say, because they were involved in some significant event - then Wikipedia should definitely mention the name. On the other hand I don't think a list of student government presidents is a good idea, nor a plain "The current student government president is John Doe." So it depends on context. Huon (talk) 00:30, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to University of New Haven may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• scientist)|Henry C. Lee]] Institute of Forensic Science - and the newest building, North Hall<ref>{{cite web|title=New Academic Building Will House Two Classrooms, MathZone|url=www.newhaven.edu/
• *Lawrence P. Flanagan (Former Chief Marketing Officer, [[MasterCard]] Worldwide

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:01, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Steven H. Kaplan

Hello Zrosen88,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Steven H. Kaplan for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. SajjadF (talk) 23:51, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:UNH circa 1968.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:UNH circa 1968.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:14, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WNHU logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WNHU logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of MuuMuse for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MuuMuse is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MuuMuse until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. → Lil-℧niquԐ1 - (Talk) - 12:18, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

You've been unsubscribed from the Feedback Request Service

Hi zrosen88! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over three years.

In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in three years or more.

You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:

1. Go to the Feedback Request Service page.
2. Decide which categories are of interest to you, under the RfC and/or GA headings.
3. Paste {{Frs user|zrosen88|limit}} underneath the relevant heading(s), where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month.
4. Publish the page.

If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.

Note that if you had a rename and left your old name subscribed to the FRS, you may be receiving this message on your new username's talk page still. If so, make sure your new account name is subscribed to the FRS, using the same procedure mentioned above.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on the Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page. Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:38, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Zrosen88. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page University of New Haven, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. You must disclose your COI. Drmies (talk) 20:45, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)