ZweiOhren

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, ZweiOhren, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! strdst_grl (call me Stardust) 16:27, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

BPMN software section

Perhaps you could put the tools you've added to BPMN#Software into already existing article of BPMN tools: Comparison_of_Business_Process_Modeling_Notation_tools and delete the software section.

Student-sl (talk) 23:06, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of YWorks

A tag has been placed on YWorks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. MrOllie (talk) 14:28, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of YEd

The article YEd has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrOllie (talk) 14:29, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

April 2011

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Stop spamming with yworks please Pm master 19:23, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Actually, my intention was far from spamming Wikipedia. I understand however that some edits I did are considered as such, and I don't want to argue here.

However, I cannot understand that in the same go that you removed inappropriate external links, you also removed internal links and marked the corresponding edits as spam.

I have undone these deletions (they were carried out automatically, I suppose), and have left explaining comments with each.

ZweiOhren (talk) 10:35, 28 April 2011 (UTC)