This article needs additional citations for verification. (December 2009) |
Von Bulow v. Von Bulow, 811 F.2d 136 (2nd Cir. 1987),[1] was a case appealed from a contempt ruling after a United States District Court rejected the claim of a reporter's privilege by Claus von Bulow and Andrea Reynolds.
| Von Bulow v. Von Bulow | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Court | United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit |
| Full case name | Martha von Bulow v. Claus von Bulow, et al |
| Argued | December 19, 1986 |
| Decided | February 10, 1987 |
| Citations | 811 F.2d 136 (2nd Cir. 1987) 55 USLW 2462 7 Fed.R.Serv.3d 389, 22 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 737 13 Media L. Rep. 2041 |
| Case history | |
| Subsequent history | Certiorari denied April 20, 1987, 107 S.Ct. 1891. |
| Court membership | |
| Judges sitting | William Homer Timbers, Thomas Joseph Meskill, Amalya Lyle Kearse |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Timbers, joined by Meskill, Kearse |
Reynolds, a paralegal, appealed a contempt ruling after she refused to submit an unpublished document for discovery. The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit upheld the contempt order. The Court reasoned that a person who had gathered information for private use without the intent to gather the information as part of an investigation for a publication was not entitled to a reporter's privilege.
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ Von Bulow v. Von Bulow, 811 F.2d 136 (2nd Cir. 1987).
 | This article relating to case law in the United States or its constituent jurisdictions is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |