Washingtonian Pub. Co. v. Pearson, 306 U.S. 30 (1939), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held the Copyright Act of 1909's deposit requirement did not require immediate deposit, or deposit before infringement occurs, in order to bring a suit for infringement.[1]
| Washingtonian Pub. Co. v. Pearson | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued December 6, 1938 Decided January 30, 1939 | |
| Full case name | Washingtonian Pub. Co. v. Pearson |
| Citations | 306 U.S. 30 (more) 59 S. Ct. 397; 83 L. Ed. 470 |
| Holding | |
| The Copyright Act of 1909's deposit requirement did not require immediate deposit, or deposit before infringement occurs, in order to bring a suit for infringement. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
In 2018, the Supreme Court will hear Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. Wall-Street.com, which will answer the similar issue of "whether a copyright owner may commence an infringement suit after delivering the proper deposit, application, and fee to the Copyright Office, but before the Register of Copyrights has acted on the application for registration."[2]
References
editExternal links
edit- Text of Washingtonian Pub. Co. v. Pearson, 306 U.S. 30 (1939) is available from: CourtListener Justia Library of Congress
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |