Wikipedia:AMA Requests for Assistance/Requests/January 2007/66.176.64.120

Case Filed On: 14:51, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedian filing request:

• 66.176.64.120 (talk · contribs)

Other Wikipedians this pertains to:

• USERNAME (talk · contribs)

Wikipedia pages this pertains to:

• Natal chart (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Questions:

Have you read the AMA FAQ?

• Answer:

How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)

• Answer:

What methods of Dispute Resolution have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.

• Answer:

What do you expect to get from Advocacy?

• Answer:

Summary:

I am being harrassed at the natal chart page under the topic astrology there are three external links which are all related to each other, for profit companies that are saying the give away online free natal reports, first, online natal reports are not accurate, I have always given away the natal report free of charge which i laboriously calculate myself. My link is constantly being removed and the links to these three related companies is left. Robert Hand used to own and still profits from Astrolabe.com, he benefits from astro.com and has an interest in planetarypositions.com the three external links that are always left. I am cruelly being harrassed and it's not fair nor is it resonable.

Followup:

When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:

Did you find the Advocacy process useful?

• Answer:

Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?

• Answer:

On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?

• Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?

• Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?

• Answer:

If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?

• Answer:

If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?

• Answer:

AMA Information

Case Status: closed

Advocate Status:

• I will look into this. SilkTork 18:02, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
• Contact has been made, and discussion has been opened on the Natal chart talk page. As yet 66.176.64.120 hasn't responded, though continues to edit the article. SilkTork 22:57, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
• 66.176.64.120 still not responding, and continuing to edit against advice. SilkTork 00:42, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
• It is difficult to advocate with someone who does not communicate. The link that 66.176.64.120 wants on the article appears to not be within Wikipedia policy and is against the wishes of other editors on the article. I have given 66.176.64.120 five days to respond, after which the link will be removed. SilkTork 11:05, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
• The link in dispute has been removed as commercial after 66.176.64.120 failed to enter into any discussions. Case closed. SilkTork 23:50, 2 February 2007 (UTC)