Wikipedia

Wikipedia:AMA Requests for Assistance/Requests/November 2006/Janhunt

< Wikipedia:AMA Requests for Assistance | Requests

Wikipedian filing request:

Other Wikipedians this pertains to:

Wikipedia pages this pertains to:

Questions:

edit

Have you read the AMA FAQ?

  • Answer:yes

How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)

  • Answer: content dispute

What methods of Dispute Resolution have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.

  • Answer:

What do you expect to get from Advocacy?

  • Answer: I find the dispute process very confusing and would really appreciate help in getting this important study included on this page.

Summary:

edit

In the Addiction section of the page, there is this statement (which I did not post):

Some have argued that prescription of stimulant medications sets children up for future addictions.[citation needed]

I know of a large study that supports the statement. At first I tried to add this description of the study: "In a study of 5,000 children followed from adolescence to adulthood, psychopharmacologist Susan Schenk of Texas A&M University found that children treated with Ritalin are three times more likely to develop a taste for cocaine." with a link to the study at http://www.nida.nih.gov/pdf/monographs/Monograph169/056-082_Schenk.pdf . This was removed. I then simply added a link to the study as a reference, and that was also removed. Obviously someone believes that Ritalin is safe for children. I am a psychologist with 40 years of experience (and I am not a Scientologist). I believe that there is a great deal of research that shows the dangers of Ritalin for children, and that parents visiting Wikipedia have the right to learn about it. Someone on the staff or a visitor disagrees with me, but they shouldn't have the right to censor this type of reference.Janhunt 19:49, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion:

edit

The section of the article you seemed concerned with seems stable now. The information on possible long term effects has been expanded by another user, but still includes the crucial info you wanted cited.


Followup:

edit

When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:

Did you find the Advocacy process useful?

  • Answer:

Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?

  • Answer:

On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?

  • Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?

  • Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?

  • Answer:

If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?

  • Answer:

If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?

  • Answer:


AMA Information

edit

Case Status: closed


Advocate Status:

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:AMA_Requests_for_Assistance/Requests/November_2006/Janhunt&oldid=1137460071"