Wikipedia:AMA Requests for Assistance/Requests/November 2006/Nobs02/Evidence
Wikipedia:Arbitration policy/Precedents#Dispute resolution
- Statement of principle
- users who are in conflict talk to one another on their respective talk pages and on the talk page of any article in dispute.
- Cases involving this principle
29 July
edit- 20:14
- nobs posts at User talk:Cberlet
- As a gesture of good faith in resolving a myriad of disputes [1]
- nobs posts at User talk:Cberlet
31 July
edit- 20:43
- nobs posts on Cberlet's talk page
- Dear Sir: I approached you in good faith; please direct any personal sentiments regarding my postings or others to my Talk page. [2]
- nobs posts on Cberlet's talk page
- 20:45
- Cberlet responds
- I have no interest in a side conversation. [3]
- Cberlet responds
3 August
edit- 19:42
- Cberlet again responds
- Please carry out all contact with me through the talk pages of specific articles. I have no interest in continuing to engage with you outside the actual editing process. Messages left here will not be responded to. [4]
- Cberlet again responds
- 20:12
- Cberlet's first RfM; refers to nobs gesture of good faith and application of dispute resolution precedents as
- harrassment [5]
- Cberlet's first RfM; refers to nobs gesture of good faith and application of dispute resolution precedents as
Illustrations of dispute
editDirect examples of improper and invalid methodology to affect POV.
22 August 2005
- 14:30
- Unsourced "balance" for primary source citation [6]
22 August 2005
- 15:43
- Questionable secondary source inserted to refute two fully qualified primary source citations. [7] Also, vagueness & relevency to Venona project questioned by multiple editors.
22 August 2005
- 17:10
- Direct, unsouced, anonymous original research criticism of primary & secondary citation. [8]. See WP:RS#Unattributed_material.
16 September 2005
- 01:42
- In a subhead entitled ==Nobs has once again misrepresented sources in his espionage paragraphs== Cberlet charges nobs with "misrepresentation", "inaccurate", "biased", and "false"; Cberlet extracts,
- " 'The following were members of the Victor Perlo Network'; That statement is not qualified as 'According to Elizabeth Bentley', or 'Elizabeth Bentley has alleged', etc."; says " this is a misrepresentation. " [9]
- In a subhead entitled ==Nobs has once again misrepresented sources in his espionage paragraphs== Cberlet charges nobs with "misrepresentation", "inaccurate", "biased", and "false"; Cberlet extracts,
30 September
- 12:46
- Cberlet files Summary of Dispute; says "Magdoff was listed by the FBI as in the Perlo Group." [10]
nobs 17:46, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
nobs 05:33, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
from Internet Wayback Machine