Wikipedia:AMA Requests for Assistance/Requests/November 2006/Nobs02/Evidence

Wikipedia:Arbitration policy/Precedents#Dispute resolution

Statement of principle
  • users who are in conflict talk to one another on their respective talk pages and on the talk page of any article in dispute.
Cases involving this principle

29 July

edit
  • 20:14

31 July

edit
  • 20:43
    • nobs posts on Cberlet's talk page
      • Dear Sir: I approached you in good faith; please direct any personal sentiments regarding my postings or others to my Talk page. [2]
  • 20:45
    • Cberlet responds
      • I have no interest in a side conversation. [3]

3 August

edit
  • 19:42
    • Cberlet again responds
      • Please carry out all contact with me through the talk pages of specific articles. I have no interest in continuing to engage with you outside the actual editing process. Messages left here will not be responded to. [4]
  • 20:12
    • Cberlet's first RfM; refers to nobs gesture of good faith and application of dispute resolution precedents as
      • harrassment [5]

Illustrations of dispute

edit

Direct examples of improper and invalid methodology to affect POV.


22 August 2005

22 August 2005

22 August 2005

16 September 2005

  • 01:42
    • In a subhead entitled ==Nobs has once again misrepresented sources in his espionage paragraphs== Cberlet charges nobs with "misrepresentation", "inaccurate", "biased", and "false"; Cberlet extracts,
      • " 'The following were members of the Victor Perlo Network'; That statement is not qualified as 'According to Elizabeth Bentley', or 'Elizabeth Bentley has alleged', etc."; says " this is a misrepresentation. " [9]

30 September


nobs 17:46, 3 October 2005 (UTC) nobs 05:33, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]


from Internet Wayback Machine

17 December

edit
  • 21:59
    • personal attack by User:Cberlet on nobs via edit summary [11]; nobs response,
      • This is an outlandish misrepresentation of a personal attack via edit summary. The financial report clearly uses the word, sales. [12] The website clearly uses the words sale of materials. [13].