Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/Candidates/Pharaoh of the Wizards

Nomination

edit

Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk · contribs · they/them) – I have been editing since 2006 that is over 18 years and plan to stay in the project for life. Hence feel that I would be a net positive in the Project.I have never edited for pay and precisely I do not edit or otherwise contribute to any WikiMedia article or project on behalf of any employer, client, or affiliated person, organization, or other entity; nor do I receive or solicit any compensation for any edits or other contributions.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:42, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Yes, I accept.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:49, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please disclose whether you have ever edited Wikipedia for pay.

No, I have not.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:49, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Questions for the candidate

edit

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. Why are you interested in becoming an administrator?
A: I am a Wikipedian for life hence and I have reported over 6900 users in UAA and over 4900 to AIV and taken part in over 5500 AFD ,I do work in Admin areas. Hence feel that my becoming an admin will be net positive to the Project and can help share the workload.
2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
A: I have created over 3000 articles and my work in UAA ,AIV and AFD is my best contribution.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: I am strict follower 1RR and have not been involved in any in any significant conflict with anyone.

You may ask optional questions below. There is a limit of two questions per editor. Multi-part questions are disallowed, but you are allowed to ask follow-up questions related to previous questions.

Discussion

edit

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.

General comments
edit