Wikipedia:Article improvement drive/Removed/3 April 2005
- Reason
One of the most important documents in human history, similar in magnitude to the Magna Carta, English Bill of Rights, the Declaration of Independence, or the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; not only in French, but very influential in all future world history. --Dmcdevit 05:25, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Support
- Comments
- Reason
- Fairly important contemporary topic with an article insufficiently neutral, comprehensive, and referenced. 119 10:10, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Support
- 119 20:18, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Maurreen 04:02, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Cool Cat My Talk 11:18, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Comments
- The imrovement run starts now. Political talk should be limited, I recomend articles meanwhile be locked to discourage edits interfereing with the merging process I mentioned. --Cool Cat My Talk 11:18, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is not POV grounds for anyone POV of several sides are published and have been pointed out at: Talk:2003 Invasion of Iraq
- There are major developments in non-Christian countries which are totally missed by this very important article. -- Beland 21:53, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Support
- Hippalus 11:51, Mar 9, 2005 (UTC)
- Maurreen 04:02, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- TIMBO (T A L K) 09:24, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Ganymead 23:20, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Anthropomorph 23:26, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Pavel Vozenilek 22:36, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Comments
- Reason
- Important theory in philosophy which has had great influence on biology, and still has influence on feminism and gender-theory. The theory has also been a cornerstone of racist thinking. The philosophy-section is very incomplete and unbalanced, the biology and the society section are nothing more than substubs. Needs a lot of work! --Hippalus 12:04, Mar 9, 2005 (UTC)
- Support
- Comments
- Reason
- On the clean up list; certainly important. -Litefantastic 17:37, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Support
- Litefantastic 17:37, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Maurreen 04:02, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Ganymead 22:39, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Comments
- Reason
- Large topic with large article. Currently listed for cleanup, the article badly needs a discussion regarding its organization and then to be heavily edited based on that consensus. Hyacinth 17:59, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Support
- Maurreen 05:12, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Dave 01:12, Mar 14, 2005 (UTC)
- Ganymead 07:51, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Jacoplane 04:32, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Neonumbers 11:04, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Comments
- Reason
- One of the more notable animes in the world today, it was already brushed-up a bit during a FA nomination. I don't think it's that far from FA...although I always say that. -Litefantastic 17:09, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Support
- Litefantastic 17:09, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Reason
- A very important arts topic with a rather poor entry. I suggested on the talk page that the section on the theater buildings should have its own entry, but as of yet, no one has responded. Ganymead 22:37, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Support
- Comments
- Reason
- This article was nominated for the article improvement drive a while back but fell short by a single vote. Ganymead 01:14, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Support
- Ganymead 01:14, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Comments
This looks like COTW territory. -Litefantastic 12:04, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- I have yet to see any difference between COTW and AID. I thought I'd propose this article again here and see what happens and if nothing happens I'll send it to COTW. Ganymead 20:31, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- This was nominated on COTW, I nominated. It did not pass, not because it was not a stub, but simply because of lack of votes.--Dmcdevit 00:25, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Since this has previously nominated, should I delist it here and nominate it again for COTW? Ganymead 01:28, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Reason
- A lot of people are interested in magic. Yet this article fails to give a comprehensive view of the art's history. It also has no real bearing with a whole bunch of unrelated sections in a non-logical order. It needs loads of help. More than I can give on my own.
- Support
- Mgm|(talk) 01:35, Mar 26, 2005 (UTC)
- Litefantastic 22:34, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Comments