Wikipedia:Articles for improvement/Archives/Unsuccessful Nominations/November 2012
| Main page | Articles for improvement | Article nominations | Schedule | Assessment | Accomplishments | Automation & templates | Participants | Talk page |
This page lists the TAFI nominations that were closed as unsuccessful in November 2012.
Closed as unsuccessful since article has received no support. AutomaticStrikeout 17:03, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
- The following Today's Article for Improvement nomination is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Raymond Smullyan, a long-standing popularizer of mathematical logic as a sub-class of recreational mathematics (or not, but simply human), in 2009 released a book he calls the link between all of his previous 'popular' (by category) writings and other material that truly involved him at the 'game' of Theorem proving. In this book, the 6th part (and 23rd chapter), begins with reference to (as its title) Craig's Interpolation Lemma. Though living, the subject is mid-90s in age--and this is neither here nor there. He is an emeritus professor at the University of California at Berkeley and would not be to be bothered, perhaps (I have no knowledge as to his condition in life), but by those near to him who might encourage the result sought for with this. It is suggested that the book I am mildly-obliquely referring to be read for that part or its subject known for a comment unless this falls outside of the possible domain of this section as a living subject (a matter I don't expect to be, but may be, the case). The improvement would be first an add on the mathematics, so that should and will be done first if this is to be done. I will need an assist (back-up or reduplication, that is) in event my working the technical part is not done well.Julzes (talk) 22:39, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Just an update. I myself have done next to nothing on this. Breezed through a bit of the book, but there is quite a bit more I would need to do myself to effect any relevant changes here.Julzes (talk) 19:31, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The Today's Article for Improvement nomination above is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The below nominations are closed as unsuccessful – the articles received no support other than from the nominator. Northamerica1000 (talk) 07:49, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
- The following Today's Article for Improvement nomination is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
A common feature of buildings everywhere on the planet; the article (as of this post) has zero sources. Northamerica1000(talk) 15:21, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support
Oppose
Comments
Easily expandable. Currently (as of this post) has one inline citation and three sources. Northamerica1000(talk) 15:11, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support
Oppose
Comments
An easily expandable article that currently (as of this post) has exactly one source/inline citation. Northamerica1000(talk) 14:57, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support
Oppose
Comments
Overall, more of a developed article, but it needs some work, and has the potential to be improved through collaboration to reach Good article designation in a timely manner due to its relatively developed state. Northamerica1000(talk) 14:41, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support
Oppose
Comments
- The Today's Article for Improvement nomination above is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.