Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Association of Members' Advocates/Requests/March 2007/Piotrus

< Wikipedia:Association of Members' Advocates | Requests

Case Filed On: 03:58, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Your problem:

edit

Let me try to be concise. I am on Wikipedia to write articles; I try to avoid pointless discussion when possible. This doesn't work out all the time, especially as being the 63rd most active editor means I "get around" on Wiki a lot and occasionally see the less pretty sides of various conflicts. Now I am involved in an Arbitration case (Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Piotrus) initaited against me by another user. Unlike a previous two-user case where I knew almost perfectly what the problem was and where do we stand, this is more confusing. I am not sure exactly what the initatior and his supporters want from this case. I am not sure what I and those who support me can expect from ArbCom (I have some ideas but how realistic are they...?). I am not sure how to present my case, as my opening statement to the arbitration was judged by the arbitrators as too long - this is a complex case with lots of angles and I am not sure which to pick and which to lose. In summary, I need a neutral editor with ArbCom experience to help steer me so I don't waste time of myself, of other parties and arbitrators, and who may suggest solutions that would actually be productive for all concerned.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  03:58, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Followup:

edit

When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:

Did you find the Advocacy process useful?

  • Answer:

Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?

  • Answer:

On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?

  • Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?

  • Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?

  • Answer:

If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?

  • Answer:

If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?

  • Answer:


AMA Information

edit

Case Status: NEW


Advocate Status:

  • None assigned.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Association_of_Members%27_Advocates/Requests/March_2007/Piotrus&oldid=1138375649"