- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard. The result of the discussion was Approved.
New to bots on Wikipedia? Read these primers!
Operator: Aidan9382 (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 17:31, Wednesday, June 8, 2022 (UTC)
Function overview: Fix the |archive=
location for the {{User:MiszaBot/config}}
template which is used by Lowercase Sigmabot III for archiving.
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic
Programming language(s): Python
Source code available: GitHub
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):
Edit period(s): Continuous (Every 15 minutes or so)
Estimated number of pages affected: Few initially, as I have been manually clearing the category for some time. Around 0 to 5 per day on average.
Namespace(s): All talk namespaces, as these are where archiving takes place
Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes
Function details: This bot is designed to automatically fix any wrong inputs put into the |archive=
parameter of {{User:MiszaBot/config}}
, which Lowercase Sigmabot III relies on for archiving talk pages. These archives normally become incorrect after a page move which an editor has forgotten to clear up. Broken articles are findable via the associated category.
Note: While this is listed as task number 2, the previous task was actually withdrawn by operator. I'm assuming the correct move here is to just consider this the second task, but please correct me if I'm wrong. Thanks. Aidan9382 (talk) 17:31, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Aidan9382: This is the correct numbering for a bot task. What do you think an appropriate number of edits would be for a trial run? The standard is 50, but can be modified and seems a bit high for this unless I'm mistaken. --TheSandDoctor Talk 15:54, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @TheSandDoctor: I'd say its high for this, as this case doesnt happen too often. If you want a lower count, maybe 20 or 25? I'm concerned any lower might be too low to cover any potential weird cases. Aidan9382 (talk) 15:58, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @TheSandDoctor: Trial complete. The 25 are here (excluding 3 development edits). Other than an issue with encoding (Special:Diff/1094354270) and another with my template parsing (Seen testing here) which have both since been fixed, the edits have worked as intended. Aidan9382 (talk) 15:32, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Approved. Under normal circumstances, I would prefer to leave the close for someone else. However, given the backlog, lack of recent BAG activity (myself included), and the fact that this task is uncontroversial and based on how well the trial went, I am inclined to make an exception for this. As per usual, if amendments to - or clarifications regarding - this approval are needed, please start a discussion on the talk page and ping. Please be sure to monitor this task and address any further edge cases that arise. --TheSandDoctor Talk 18:23, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard.