Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/AvocatoBot 2

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Approved.

AvocatoBot

Operator: Avocato (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 01:13, Friday September 7, 2012 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic, supervised

Programming language(s): Python

Source code available: Standard pywikipedia (redirect.py)

Function overview: Fixing double redirects

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): My first request for bot flag, with one task: Interwiki.

Edit period(s): Continuous (when needed)

Estimated number of pages affected: open-ended (per the existence of double redirects)

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes

Function details: My bot will fix double redirects by using:

redirect.py double -api -always -lang:"en" -family:wikipedia

redirect.py double -always -lang:"en" -family:wikipedia

for any page makes a double redirect (unless it was protected). My bot makes the same task at: ar.wiki, Commons, Meta and specieswiki.--Avocato (talk) 01:13, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

My bot made 11 test edits.--Avocato (talk) 12:43, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. Test edits look fine, and the bot is using a standard script. Bot operator runs the bot on several other wikis and already has an approved task. However, please note, Avocato, that unlike most other wikis, we require bots to be approved for a trial before they make test edits, no harm done in this case, but bear that in mind in the future. - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 16:07, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.