Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Bot1058 6
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Approved.
Operator: Wbm1058 (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 14:39, Thursday, December 5, 2019 (UTC)
Function overview: Remove disambiguation pages from Category:Monitored short pages
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic
Programming language(s): PHP
Source code available:
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Template talk:Long comment#Usage on pages that don't appear on ShortPages, Template talk:Short pages monitor#Add by default to DAB pages?
Edit period(s): One time run, followed by periodic runs as needed to keep the category clean
Estimated number of pages affected: 53,400 (initial run)
Namespace(s): Mainspace
Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): No
Function details: This is a followup task to task 5. Remove the text added by {{subst:long comment}} from disambiguation pages (members of Category:All article disambiguation pages) listed in Category:Monitored short pages; since this January 2016 MediaWiki update these pages no longer need this text to keep the page off the top of the Special:ShortPages listings. As with task 5, there is no reason to make this process exclusion compliant. Category:Monitored short pages currently has about 64,700 members; removing around 53,400 of them will leave about 11,300 members, ~300 of which are disambiguation pages whose long comment string does not conform with the string left by {{subst:long comment}} (either because it was manually placed or edited by someone later). These will be removed later, either manually or tweaking the set of long-comment strings recognized by the bot. The remaining ~11,000 category members are things like set index articles or soft redirects (e.g. {{Wiktionary redirect}}).
Discussion
editApproved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Primefac (talk) 15:07, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Trial complete. 50 edits, no issues. – wbm1058 (talk) 16:36, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good to me. Approved.. As per usual, if amendments to - or clarifications regarding - this approval are needed, please start a discussion on the talk page and ping. --TheSandDoctor Talk 10:15, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.