Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DannyS712 bot 39
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Approved.
Operator: DannyS712 (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 19:39, Thursday, May 16, 2019 (UTC)
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: automatic
Programming language(s): AWB
Source code available: AWB
Function overview: Replace {{Better source|reason=per WP:CIRCULAR
with {{Circular reference
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/Tasks#More specific maintenance tag
Edit period(s): One time run
Estimated number of pages affected: ~2500
Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): No
Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes
Function details: As a result of a discussion (User talk:Basilicofresco#FrescoBot Better source tag), Basilicofresco updated their bot to tag circular references with {{circular reference}}, rather than {{better source}} - this task would convert the old better source tag that have "per WP:CIRCULAR" as the reason to use {{circular reference}} instead.
Discussion
edit- @Finnusertop, StudiesWorld, and Basilicofresco: see BRFA above. --DannyS712 (talk) 19:40, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. — xaosflux Talk 15:11, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @Xaosflux: Trial complete. - 51 edits made, sorry: [1]. I didn't see any issues. I ran the trial without genfixes enabled, but I can enable them if you want. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 19:37, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- {{BAGAssistanceNeeded}} Ping to Xaosflux. DannyS712 (talk) 15:33, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @Xaosflux: Trial complete. - 51 edits made, sorry: [1]. I didn't see any issues. I ran the trial without genfixes enabled, but I can enable them if you want. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 19:37, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Approved. As per usual, if amendments to - or clarifications regarding - this approval are needed, please start a discussion on the talk page and ping. --TheSandDoctor Talk 17:10, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.