Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Joe's Null Bot 10

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Approved.

Joe's Null Bot 10

Operator: Joe Decker (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 04:35, Tuesday July 29, 2014 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic

Programming language(s): PERL

Source code available: Yep, on request

Function overview: Purge WP:PERM 1/hour

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): User_talk:Joe_Decker#New_Purge_Bot_task

Edit period(s): 1/hr

Estimated number of pages affected: 1

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes.

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): y

Function details: Purge WP:PERM 1x/hour to force an updated transclusion of its ten or so child pages.

Underlying detail: Like task 2, but unlike most of the other tasks for this bot, the current delay appears to be a job queue delay rather than a deeper bug., I've seen delays into the small number of hours there. Trivial change to existing code, so relatively low risk, and I'm more than happy to add it.

Discussion

Approved for trial (7 days). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. — Please post any issues or results here after the trial. xaosflux ^Talk 11:52, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I requested this task, so will want another BAG member to review the trial for final approval. — xaosflux ^Talk 11:52, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just started, will report back in 7 days. --j⚛e decker ^talk 18:41, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Trial complete.

As expected, I heard quite a bit of silence. A few tests with the code in manual mode showed that it did the right thing. A few spot checks after it's hourly run seemed to confirm that. Other than that, no problems were observed or reported. --j⚛e decker ^talk 23:29, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for update, pinging for someone else in BAG to comment or approve:

A user has requested the attention of a member of the Bot Approvals Group. Once assistance has been rendered, please deactivate this tag by replacing it with {{t|BAG assistance needed}}. — xaosflux ^Talk 16:03, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging recently active BAG'ers @Magioladitis:, @MBisanz:. — xaosflux ^Talk 16:01, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

xaosflux any comments of the bot trial? Do you think it was OK? I'll be back home in 2 days. If everything is OK I can approve the task. -- Magioladitis (talk) 23:58, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

All looked fine from what I saw, this is a super-simple task (hit purge once an hour for 1 page) and it appears to be helping. If it's still running as trial, I'm fine to let it continue until approval completes. Thanks! — xaosflux ^Talk 03:44, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.