Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Legobot 24
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Withdrawn by operator.
Operator: Legoktm (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 19:24, Monday October 29, 2012 (UTC)
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic
Programming language(s): Python
Source code available: github
Function overview: Update {{infobox hurricane current}}
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): botreq, extended discussion on my talk
Edit period(s): Checks hourly
Estimated number of pages affected: Ask Mother Nature
Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes
Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes
Function details:
- Reads from the "control panel" at User:Legobot/Current hurricanes (semi-protected)
- Fetches and parses the NHC report (example for Sandy)
- Updates various parameters in the infobox. To try and avoid math errors, most of the numbers are parsed from the report rather than converting them.
- In the future, I might try and automate the uploading of the satellite images, but that will probably be a separate request.
Discussion
editWhile I typically don't do this, I'd like to request a "speedy trial" as I would like to test this on Hurricane Sandy. Since it's near landfall, it will get updates every 2 hours, giving me enough data to make sure it's fully compatible with everything. For the purpose of the trial, I would be manually starting the bot and debugging it so any errors would get quickly reverted and fixed. Thanks, Legoktm (talk) 19:24, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Approved for trial (Sandy). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 19:33, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I might not seeing it, but did your bot edit Hurricane Sandy? mabdul 19:05, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes/No. I was running it on my local machine so I forgot to set it to use the bot's account, so it edited twice under my account. I tried switching it over to labs, however that was giving me a different output when using BeautifulSoup, so I'm still looking into that. I also want to clean up the way the /Current hurricanes control page works so it's a bit more flexible. Legoktm (talk) 19:11, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- While I think we need to look into this and see quite what happened, a month later nothing has changed on the BRfA, so might I suggest an extended trial until any large hurricanes come up, as Sandy is well and truly over now. Is this task going to go anywhere? Rcsprinter (talk to me) @ 00:17, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry about that, I've been busy with other things. Given that the 2012 Atlantic hurricane season is over, and 2013 isn't bound to start for a while, I'll poke Anonymouse to see if we can still trial it on a few other storms, otherwise I'll withdraw this until next June. Legoktm (talk) 21:18, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- While I think we need to look into this and see quite what happened, a month later nothing has changed on the BRfA, so might I suggest an extended trial until any large hurricanes come up, as Sandy is well and truly over now. Is this task going to go anywhere? Rcsprinter (talk to me) @ 00:17, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes/No. I was running it on my local machine so I forgot to set it to use the bot's account, so it edited twice under my account. I tried switching it over to labs, however that was giving me a different output when using BeautifulSoup, so I'm still looking into that. I also want to clean up the way the /Current hurricanes control page works so it's a bit more flexible. Legoktm (talk) 19:11, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by operator. I'll put this "on hold" until May/June-ish when storms start again. Thanks, Legoktm (talk) 05:00, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.