Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Qwerfjkl (bot) 2
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard. The result of the discussion was Approved.
Operator: Qwerfjkl (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 19:03, Tuesday, October 5, 2021 (UTC)
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: automatic
Programming language(s): AutoWikiBrowser
Source code available: AWB
Function overview: Fix CW Error #101
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):
Edit period(s): When necessary
Estimated number of pages affected: ~1,900
Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes
Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes
Function details: I'd like to run AWB'S general fixes to fix CW error #101 (e.g. 1<sup>st</sup>
).
Discussion
editApproved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Primefac (talk) 07:27, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @Primefac Hi, I forgot to mention that my bot is not on the AWB checkpage. Please can you add it? ― Qwerfjkltalk 20:29, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. Primefac (talk) 07:38, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Trial complete. @Primefac - see
these contributionsthese contributions. There was a typo in the edit summary, and a minor problem here with GENFIX incorrectly closing a template. ― Qwerfjkltalk 15:53, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]- What's the typo in the edit summary? I'm guessing it's the CW number, because the diffs say CW #48 whereas this BRFA is for CW #101, but would be good to clarify. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 01:05, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @ProcrastinatingReader Oops. I didn't do the contributions link by time, so it no longer works. I've replaced it with a search for the AWB tag in the bot's contributions (which will also not work if my bot does anymore AWB editing). The typo is "fic" instead of "fix". ― Qwerfjkltalk 18:24, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- What's the typo in the edit summary? I'm guessing it's the CW number, because the diffs say CW #48 whereas this BRFA is for CW #101, but would be good to clarify. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 01:05, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Trial complete. @Primefac - see
- Done. Primefac (talk) 07:38, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- {{BAG assistance needed}} ― Qwerfjkltalk 20:09, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Approved. LGTM. Thanks for your work on this. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 19:13, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard.