Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Sagabot
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Operator: Sagaciousuk
Automatic or Manually Assisted: Both
Programming Language(s): Wikipedia:AWB
Function Summary: Wikipedia:CFD/W & Wikipedia:CFD/WU
Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Daily.
Edit rate requested: 6 edits per min
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): N
Function Details: Working on Wikipedia:Categories for discussion
Discussion
editWill this do the usual rename/replace tasks I presume? The only question then becomes: will you verify the items on CfD/W by hand before launching each mass replacement/removal operation? This would avoid huge messes due to malicious reporting of results.Voice-of-All 17:25, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes I will be verifying that the pages were deleted on WP:CFD and that they were there for at least 7 days before mass runs. --Sagaciousuk (talk) 19:33, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I see that you don't have much CfD/W experience and are still a bit new. I suppose you don't really need those as long as you just check the validy its fine. Since this is a common AWB task, I don't see much mistake risk. Voice-of-All 22:47, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll hold off on approving this shortly, until you add info to the bot's page and test this out on a few CfD cases.Voice-of-All 00:11, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I see that you don't have much CfD/W experience and are still a bit new. I suppose you don't really need those as long as you just check the validy its fine. Since this is a common AWB task, I don't see much mistake risk. Voice-of-All 22:47, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Approved for trial, as per VoA's edit. -- RM 13:18, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Approved; the bot shall run with a flag. Voice-of-All 00:03, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Bot flag has been set. - Taxman Talk 00:56, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.