Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/SoxBot 18

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was

Request Expired.

SoxBot 18

Operator: X!

Automatic or Manually assisted: Automatic

Programming language(s): PHP with Pillar framework

Source code available: Not yet

Function overview: Adding parameter to talk page templates.

Edit period(s): One time run

Estimated number of pages affected: Roughly 1800

Exclusion compliant (Y/N): N

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y

Function details: Per this botreq, this bot will go around through all pages in Category:WikiProject EastEnders articles, and will get the text of each one. If it detects the presence of a listas parameter, it skips the page. Else, it adds it to the {{EastEnders project class}} template.

It's not exclusion compliant, seeing at the Pillar framework does not yet support it.

Discussion

The Pillar framework does support exclusion compliance, as far as I can see; can you not call checkexcluded('SoxBot') on each page before you modify it? — madman bum and angel 20:50, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, yes. I didn't know that it existed. (X! · talk) · @075 · 00:47, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to see source code, especially as I'd understand it, but you're an experienced bot operator. Please make this task exclusion compliant, then you are Approved for trial. Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete.. — madman bum and angel 03:44, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{BotTrialComplete}} (X! · talk) · @252 · 05:02, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Per [1], please fix and

Approved for trial (20 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete.. — madman bum and angel 22:57, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A user has requested the attention of the operator. Once the operator has seen this message and replied, please deactivate this tag. (user notified) It's been over a month... any updates on this one? The Earwig (Talk | Contribs) 00:03, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request Expired. — JamesR ^(talk) 00:52, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.