Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/YasBot

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Request Expired.

YasBot

Operator: پسر یاس (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 07:23, Saturday August 11, 2012 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic

Programming language(s): Python

Source code available: pywikipedia - Interwiki

Function overview: Interwiki for new articles.

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):

Edit period(s): daily

Estimated number of pages affected: Weekly ~100 edites.

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): No

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes(home wiki is fa)

Function details: Just for insert Interwiki for new articles.and used standard code in pywikipedia.

Discussion

Tnx پسر یاس (talk) 07:23, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This bot appears to have edited since this BRFA was filed. Bots may not edit outside their own or their operator's userspace unless approved or approved for trial. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:24, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This bot has been operating since August 17. As stated in Bot Policy, your bot should not edit before it has been given permission for a trial or approved. Make sure you have reviewed the local bot policy. Also, what interwiki options do you intend to use? Noom (t) 13:01, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's been editing today as recently as an hour ago. I've blocked it as the user doesn't seem to be reading their talk page. I've no objection if anyone wants to unblock. Secretlondon (talk) 18:36, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You said that, but I did not see,Now, my robot editing on namespace after give permission (on ru,se,is,pl,fa,...) .According to the talk stop working robot elsewhere,and please Unblock my robot and request flag will check as soon as possible. Thank you and apologize for it پسر یاس (talk) 04:13, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Being blocked on en would not stop it editing on ru, se etc. It's not allowed to edit on en so does not need to be unblocked. Secretlondon (talk) 10:07, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See user's talk page for comments on the bot's behaviour. Secretlondon (talk) 09:43, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Will you obey en.wiki rules if I unblock the account for a test run? MBisanz ^talk 17:51, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

yes of courseپسر یاس (talk) 07:50, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We have several other perfectly functioning cross-wiki bots, and Wikidata coming in soon. I don't think we should approve this, considering the operator's poor track record in recent days. Sven Manguard Wha? 15:17, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

According to the Wikidata timeline, it is supposed to be finished by March 2013, plus a few months for deployment. I don't think the coming of Wikidata should stop us from approving interwiki bots, however operator conduct should. Lego K^ontribs T^alkM 16:30, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll Recently check my Bot every day.Plz unblock my Bot.پسر یاس (talk) 19:30, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. and bot unblocked. MBisanz ^talk 06:38, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tnxپسر یاس (talk) 19:30, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A user has requested the attention of the operator. Once the operator has seen this message and replied, please deactivate this tag. (user notified) The bot has appeared to have made 489 edits, many over the 50 edit trial. Please stop the bot from making any more edits. Thanks. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It actually hasn't edited at all since being approved for trial. Since the operator's been notified anyway, though, are there any plans to proceed with this trial or do you wish to withdraw this task? (If we don't hear back from you, we'll probably mark it as expired within a week or two.) — madman 01:11, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Request Expired. Please unarchive if you decide to pursue this task. MBisanz ^talk 01:00, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.