It says it's a direct copy from a .gov site. It needs to by made to sound more encyclopedic, wikified (sections?), and probably condensed. --Dmcdevit 05:21, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
- Added to User:Linuxbeak/Desk --Randy 16:18, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
- Task accepted. Linuxbeak 16:22, May 8, 2005 (UTC)
Source found, and it's indeed a direct copy. I removed 80% of the article because it was hopelessly unencyclopedic and frankly doesn't belong in an article. I will move to close this article now. Linuxbeak 20:47, May 8, 2005 (UTC)
Task closed. Linuxbeak 03:38, May 9, 2005 (UTC)