The Pi_Beta_Phi article contains a handful of factual errors at first glance, possibly more upon a more thorough examination. Fact checking is suggested and a gentle reformating of some of the rougher segments requested. Bluenotem3 10:49, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
What facts need to be updated? I don't see any factual errors.
Note: This taskforce request has not been updated for 6 months.
Without knowing what facts need to be corrected that can not be addressed.
It looks very good (and people are working on it).
closing RJFJR 21:05, 25 September 2007 (UTC)