Wikipedia:Collaboration of the week/Maintenance
 | This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump. |
- If you believe that an article is too long for nomination, and would be better suited for the Article Improvement Drive, you can mark it with the {{notastub}} template (making sure to use subst), which will display:
 | The Collaboration of the Week is for stubs and non-existent pages. Consider nominating at the Article Improvement Drive instead. |
- If a nomination expires, edit this page and remove the text including it, and add this text to the bottom of Wikipedia:Collaboration of the week/Removed.
- When the time comes to update the current collaboration, follow these steps:
- remove the winning nomination from the list, and update the date that a future nomination will be selected, with an edit summary of [[New article]] has been selected (replace "new article" with the article name).
- edit the past collaboration page, and remove the {{COTWnow}} template from the top of the page.
- edit the past collaboration's talk page, and after removing any COTW-related tags it may have, add the template {{past cotw|(date selected)|(year selected)}}.
- add {{COTWnow}} to the new collaboration.
- update {{cotw1}} with the name of the new collaboration.
- update {{cotw2}} with the name of the previous collaboration.
- perform a history diff between the date the {{COTWnow}} template was added, and when you removed it, copy the section of the URL starting with
diff=, and paste this in {{cotw3}}. - update Wikipedia:Community Portal/COTW with the introduction of the new collaboration, as appropriate.
- update Wikipedia:Collaboration of the week/History with the new collaboration of the week.
- Optional: put {{subst:COTWvoter}} ~~~~ on the talk pages of the people who voted for the winning nomination.