Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Disambiguations

Shortcuts

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Disambiguations. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Disambiguations|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Disambiguations. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Disambiguations/archive

Purge page cache

watch

Disambiguations

Israeli occupation (disambiguation)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnecessary disambiguation page. The guideline WP:Broad-concept article says not to create a dab page when we already have an article—Israeli-occupied territories—that covers all of the subjects listed on the dab page (and has convenient links for the subtopics in the first few sentences of the lead). (t · c) buidhe 03:36, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Disambiguations, Israel, Lebanon, Palestine, and Syria. (t · c) buidhe 03:36, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This could be useful for below pages
Astropulse (talk) 03:40, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What do you mean, "This could be useful for below pages"? Articles don't link to dab pages except as a hatnote, but hatnotes are not appropriate for any of these articles because their titles are unambiguous. (t · c) buidhe 03:48, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If someone google, Israeli occupation and reaches west bank occupation - disambiguation page may be used to direct to appropriate page they are looking for Astropulse (talk) 03:55, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I have nothing else to add, it's simply redundant. Jdcomix (talk) 12:32, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a violation of an important guideline: WP:Broad-concept article. gidonb (talk) 14:00, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant. — Alien333 (what I did & why I did it wrong) 17:30, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vĩnh Hòa

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All of the entries on this dab page are redlinks, apart from one to the Vĩnh Hòa, Nha Trang location. This disambiguation page does not list articles associated with the same title. It is effectively being used as a category page, ~~so it would be better converted to a category~~. Northernhenge (talk) 11:57, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness, Business, and Vietnam. Northernhenge (talk) 11:57, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete those red links will less likely to be created as it lacks notability or even mentioned in the articles per se so it clearly violates MOS:DABRL Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 12:11, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: DAB with one entry, nothing to DAB. I don't see any particular benefit to creating a category for this either. -- D'n'B-t -- 12:51, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:00, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: It is not a problem if dab page entries are red links, as long as they include one blue link to an article which mentions the topic. I've cleaned up this dab page, and the remaining red-linked communes are all mentioned in their district pages (though not sourced in most/all cases). For all I know this means "North area" or something similarly generic, but it seems useful to offer a dab page given that this placename is used for so many identifiable communes. It's now a properly formatted dab page with valid entries. PamD 08:22, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks – I can see now that wp:PRIMARYRED could apply. I’ve added a link to Vĩnh Hòa, An Giang. I see there are other articles for similarly names places, for example
but it would need a native speaker or subject expert to say whether or not they are the same name, and whether (as PamD says) the name is significant in itself. I still think a category would be a better way of grouping these together though via their larger province areas, given the unlikelihood of notability being established for each individual commune/ward. The articles we do have pretty much just say the places exist. --Northernhenge (talk) 10:03, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure what you mean, as you can't have red linked entities in a category. You wouldn't want a category of "Districts which include a commune called Vinh Hoa". Given that these all get a mention on their district page, it seems a useful and correct dab page. PamD 10:21, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You wouldn't want a category of "Districts which include a commune called Vinh Hoa" – True! --Northernhenge (talk) 11:17, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Northernhenge I still don't understand what you meant when you said a category would be a better way of grouping these together though via their larger province areas. Could you clarify? PamD 12:02, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think it would have resembled "Districts which include a commune called Vinh Hoa" which, now I’ve seen it written down, doesn’t look sensible. --Northernhenge (talk) 16:40, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And as you suggest, those of us who aren't familiar with Vietnamese have no right to make assumptions as to whether these other places are the same or different - but I've recently almost confused placenames Unsworth and Usworth in my own country, so there's no reason to suppose that they are the same. Best left well alone, as long as dab pages are correctly formatted and we don't have red links without a mention in a blue-linked article. PamD 10:32, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. Nomination withdrawn and no "Delete" votes. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:49, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Del Turco

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only one entry on this alleged disambiguation page is legit (Del Turco (surname)). The other three are all partial matches. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:37, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:52, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: It seems pretty plausible that someone searching for Rosselli del Turco would put in Del Turco, not least because that is what part of that family were called. The buildings can go though. -- D'n'B-t -- 10:30, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep there are 2 more "Del Turco" articles listed there that is not just people's names but also buildings. I don't see why this should be deleted Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 12:01, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and move the PTM placenames to a "See also" section. BD2412 T 22:37, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw nomination. The buildings would not be called "Del Turco", any more than the Empire State Building would be called the "State" Building. However, after reading the Rosselli del Turco article, it seems two families merged, the Rossellis and the Del Turcos, so with a bit of rewording, that entry would be acceptable. Clarityfiend (talk) 12:57, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:44, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Volapük (disambiguation)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contains only one topic. Occidental𓍝Phantasmagoria [T/C] 23:49, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Occidental𓍝Phantasmagoria [T/C] 23:49, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as WP:G14. jlwoodwa (talk) 01:33, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom as unambiguous. BD2412 T 22:39, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete under WP:G14, I tagged it to this effect. Otherwise delete under same rationale. Bestagon ⬡ 02:05, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Casey Calvert (disambiguation)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disambiguation page not required (WP:ONEOTHER). Primary topic article has a hatnote to the only other use. (Cannot be PRODed because a previous incarnation of the page was PRODed). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:14, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:14, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:46, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 20:23, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per the nomination. Delete. Go4thProsper (talk) 16:33, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Disambiguations

Contents

Disambiguations

Israeli occupation (disambiguation)

Vĩnh Hòa

Del Turco

Volapük (disambiguation)

Casey Calvert (disambiguation)

Proposed deletions

Redirects for discussion

See also