Wikipedia

Wikipedia:DynaMed/Approved

< Wikipedia:DynaMed
  1. WeijiBaikeBianji (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) As my edit history will disclose, I am currently interested in updating the high-page-view article Leprosy with medically reliable sources, and I watchlist other articles related to medicine (and the WikiProject Medicine project pages) as part of improving articles related to human genetics and psychology. I'm committing to following the Wikipedia content guideline on correct sources for medical articles so adding this resource to the other resources I have access to through Wikipedia Library would be most appreciated. Thanks for coordinating the applications. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 23:39, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Lilitik22 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I'm an editor in hy.wikipedia for already 4 years as well as a sysop. I have 43 000 edits in all wiki projects and 3400 articles. Among my articles there are many medical articles and I need additional sources for them and for new ones. --Lilitik22 (talk) 11:28, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Keilana (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I'm a highly active medical area in obstetrics and gynecology, specifically gynecologic oncology. Since I'm not affiliated with a medical institution, I do not have access to DynaMed normally. I am currently working on bringing all major gynecologic oncology articles to Featured status, and having DynaMed would greatly enhance the articles I work on, which are both high importance and high-impact. Keilana|Parlez ici 04:26, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Approved. @Keilana: Please look out for a Wikipedia email from me with a link containing instructions on how to complete the next stage in the Dynamed account activation process. Don't forget to check your junk/spam folder! Many thanks,  Philg88 ♦talk 09:32, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4. jkokavec (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I'm an ophthalmologist and biomedical scientist and regularly contribute to articles on ophthalmology, vision science and molecular biology. I need full-text access in order to substantiate my contributions with the highest quality evidence available. Thank you, Jkokavec (talk) 01:39, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Jkokavec: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:20, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  5. tarawneh (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have been editing Arabic Wikipedia for more than 10 years, I usually write articles that handles medical cases and I try to help my students direct their translation work to medical articles, with a history of 24k+ edits on ar.wiki alone, 6k of these almost dedicated to medical work. Full-text access will be a game changer for me. Thank you, --Tarawneh (talk) 22:45, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Tarawneh: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:29, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Dineshkumar Ponnusamy (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email), I volunteer Tamil Wiki Community for past 4+ years, I write articles about Radiology related topics. I guess it would be helpful to write more clinical based content. Thanks. --Dineshkumar Ponnusamy (talk) 17:00, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Dineshkumar Ponnusamy: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 18:50, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  7. JzG (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Admin since Jan 2006, edit count in the top 500 or so. Interested in medical topics especially contentious and fringe areas, dealing with WP:FRINGE claims and lots of WP:MEDRS assessments. Member of Health Watch UK. Guy (Help!) 22:18, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @JzG: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 17:45, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    no Not approved per discussion on Guy's talk page. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:39, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Gliu (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email), registered in 2007, I'm constantly working on medical articles, which I usually support with lots of references (here is the last one). --Gliu 15:34, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Gliu: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:39, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I edit medical articles and am actively engaged in a quality improvement initiative with BMJ. This subscription would support both of those initiatives. 06:58, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Anthonyhcole: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:39, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  10. @Warfieldian: I have been active in Wikipedia medicine content creation and member of Wikiproject Medicine. Created Colposcopy article and have provided many medical images. Access would help with verifying content and providing reliable info. Warfieldian (talk) 17:10, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Warfieldian: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 16:11, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Kevin Gorman (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) - I'm familiar with (but have never had institutional access to) Dynamed, and appropriately using their content seems like an easy intermediate between ambitious entire article rewrites using impeccable MEDRS sources and allowing a lot of our content areas to continue as bad off as they are, even though they should theoretically be covered by MEDRS. An appropriate Dynamed source about a particular drug or lab test is significantly easier to use in the context of a Wikipedia article than higher order journal articles often are, even though such articles frequently currenty use, er, 'iffy' sources' at best. It's impossible to know what exactly I would use it for since I've only seen it briefly, but I can't imagine it not being useful. Kevin Gorman (talk) 02:12, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Kevin Gorman: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 16:11, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Vini 175 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) - I am an experienced editor in pt.wikipedia and member of WikiProject Medicine. I mostly write about medical content and have many contributions on various areas, such as pulmonology and endocrinology. Dynamed content will improve my access to reliable informations and help me to improve the quality of many articles in Portuguese. Vinicius Siqueira (talk) 02:31, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Vini 175: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 16:11, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Austral_blizzard (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I'm interested in the improvement of medical articles in the Spanish Wikipedia, a lot of them don't have enough verifiable citations, which is the reason I'd like to have access to DynaMed. My areas of interest are mostly those related to non-communicable diseases which according to the World Health Organization are the leading cause of death worldwide. Best regards, --Cristian ] Yes? 02:45, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Austral blizzard: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:21, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Ratel (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I've been editing and creating various medical articles for 10 years, especially those in the chronic pelvic pain area. Access to medical articles is always an issue. Thanks Ratel (talk) 22:57, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ratel: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:05, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:DynaMed/Approved&oldid=1138444699"