Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives/Archive 86
This is an archive of past discussions about Wikipedia:Edit filter. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
Archive 80 | ← | Archive 84 | Archive 85 | Archive 86 | Archive 87 | Archive 88 | → | Archive 90 |
116.89.224.168
- Username
- 116.89.224.168 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- Operation Black Buck (filter log)
- Description
- Add in first names of each crew member of Withers' Vulcan and Tuxford's Victor
- Date and time
- 20:43, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
The false positive is simple enough, caused by the nickname Dick. However, I'm not comfortable enough that the edit is actually an improvement to perform it for you. Are you able to make the request on the talk page? I'd encourage you to do that. Thanks. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 23:42, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
72.130.71.209
- Username
- 72.130.71.209 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- Psychological behaviorism (filter log)
- Description
- Special:AbuseLog/21598861 That may be original research, but it's not "Alt-right labeling".
- Date and time
- 00:47, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
@Mr. Guye: Literally all that filter does is check for triple parenthesis. To that effect, it catches exactly what it is supposed to. Not sure what this has to do with the alt-right (MusikAnimal may be able to enlighten us), but I don't see that anything requires action. It was a bad edit, and it is just a warning, after all. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 01:09, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- It's tagging as "possible" vandalism. If it's not, don't worry about :) The triple parentheses is an indication of labeling some subject as being antisemitic (originated by the alt-right), which according to the logs is still an ongoing vandalism trend. You could improve the filter by using a negative lookahead/behind to make sure there are exactly three surrounding parentheses. I quickly tried this with no luck, but I'm sure it's possible — MusikAnimal talk 01:53, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
SAMUEL DARAMOLA PAPOUS
- Username
- SAMUEL DARAMOLA PAPOUS (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- Page not specified
- Description
- Date and time
- 05:19, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
- If you continue to link your instagram page you will be blocked. Someguy1221 (talk) 06:47, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
82.148.189.170
- Username
- 82.148.189.170 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- Kaspar Hauser (filter log)
- Description
- Trying to correct the song title of Håkan Hellström's song to "Fri till slut" from "Fri tillslut"
- Date and time
- 09:02, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
Thanks, obvious typo has been fixed. --bonadea contributions talk 09:08, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
2600:1011:B048:F6D9:0:16:E56:3901
- Username
- 2600:1011:B048:F6D9:0:16:E56:3901 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- Page not specified
- Description
- Date and time
- 01:39, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
This probably isn't necessary; if you think it is, I'd request it on the talk page. Thanks. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 11:32, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
2601:191:8400:92B0:6536:EB70:1EA5:E081
- Username
- 2601:191:8400:92B0:6536:EB70:1EA5:E081 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- Marquis de Sade (filter log)
- Description
- You cannot "begin a sexual relationship" with a 14-year-old if you are an adult. It is sexual abuse. I changed this before and it was changed back. Wikipedia needs to monitor the disgusting men who defend rape, abuse, etc. in their edits.
- Date and time
- 15:42, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
Working as intended. Home Lander (talk) 19:05, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
106.209.128.15
- Username
- 106.209.128.15 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- BDSM (filter log)
- Description
- I was trying to add below given image (and caption)-
[[:File:Pegging cropped.jpg|thumb|left|A BDSM activity can, but need not, involve sexual acts. Graphic shows a female pegging a male submissive doggy-style using a strap-on dildo.]] Reason I was trying to add this image is that sexual activity is often a part of BDSM. It's strange that not even one image in BDSM article depicts a sexual act.
- Date and time
- 18:07, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
Filter really is working as intended. IP, if you could link to the image instead of displaying it here, that would be great. Home Lander (talk) 19:11, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
91.7.118.52
- Username
- 91.7.118.52 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- Zeuhl (filter log)
- Description
- I was adding Zeuhl bands to "List of bands", namely those from the Category: Zeuhl not listed on the Zeuhl page.
- Date and time
- 10:45, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
Not exactly sure what caused this, didn't look closely though. I notice that the article currently includes sources for all of the list entries; you should probably provide sources for the ones you added, too; if you list them here I'll make the edit for you. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 01:08, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for your help! Here's the list:
91.7.118.52 (talk) 15:50, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- Your initial edit also included Sebkha-Chott. Do you have a source for that one too? Prog Archives lists them as RIO/Avant-Prog. I've done these four, thank you for your contributions. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 23:39, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
You're right. Here's a source for Sebkha-Chott[5]. Thanks.91.7.118.52 (talk) 12:16, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- I guess that's close enough. Done, and thanks again. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 01:46, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
2600:1:F232:7C0C:FD7A:F293:E848:596
- Username
- 2600:1:F232:7C0C:FD7A:F293:E848:596 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- Page not specified
- Description
- Date and time
- 01:47, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
Working perfectly. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 02:03, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
130.132.173.210
- Username
- 130.132.173.210 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- I was just adding missing words and there was an error (filter log)
- Description
- add words
- Date and time
- 14:06, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
71.67.177.56
- Username
- 71.67.177.56 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- Hermetic Seal (filter log)
- Description
- added the adjective "basically" to the word "airtight". It was said that the seal was airtight, but yet air and other gases weren't counted toward the airtight seal. That's ridiculous for the definition of airtight is that no air can escape! So by definition the hermetic seal is not airtight, but close to it....so "basically". Now perhaps a better word could be used, but I cannot stand idly by to such a blatanty poor usage of the word "airtight" with the destruction of the word in parentheses! Its an oxymoron and so I tried to fix it best I could by using the word noted above (basically). If my choice was poor then at least I will bring attention to the discrepancy that is obviously there. Please correct it, whether using "basically" or another completely different, just correct it please. Thank you.
- Date and time
- 04:18, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
- That's not the meaning the author intended. "Excludes the passage of..." as in, "these things are excluded from passing through." As in, "this is literally the definition of 'airtight'". But I will admit that's a weird false positive, so I'll take a look at that filter. Someguy1221 (talk) 04:41, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
2600:1700:6191:2760:7989:D92D:B66B:C817
- Username
- 2600:1700:6191:2760:7989:D92D:B66B:C817 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- [[Big Black]] (filter log)
- Description
- Trying to add information that was on the page in the past. Edit disallowed due to being "unconstructive".
- Date and time
- 18:20, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
- Thanks for letting us know. Should be fixed now. Someguy1221 (talk) 05:09, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
83.216.127.138
- Username
- 83.216.127.138 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- T-SHIRT (filter log)
- Description
- Removing comercial link to some greedy guy selling bitcoin t-shirts as he seemed to be using the "see also" section as his personal advertising section.
- Date and time
- 13:58, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
Spam link has been removed by Chrissymad. Home Lander (talk) 15:34, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Gohighwhentheygolow
- Username
- Gohighwhentheygolow (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- Scott Wagner (filter log)
- Description
- Edit the page to include information about his most recent town meeting, and I had three sources sited. Here is what I wrote:
On July 18, 2018 at a Town hall meeting Wagner called 18 year old, Rose Strauss, "a little young and naive", when she asked about global warming, and money he received. He turned the question to a 2013 Wall Street Journal article about the City of Harrisburg and how ancient and outdated the infrastructure was in 2013 and said he wanted to discuss what was mentioned in the article about the sewage treatment plant that can not handle all the rainwater and the sewage, so they discharge raw sewage into the Susquehanna river.
The Wall Street Journal Article he mentions refers to, Bottom Falls Out of Debt-Ridden City, dated January 31, 2013, discusses the debt used to retrofit a state-of-the-art trash incinerator, and mentions the City of Harrisburg financially struggling to upgrade a sewage treatment facility. On February 11, 2015 there was a City of Harrisburg Clean Water Act Settlement, where the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announced a proposed partial settlement with co-plaintiff Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection and the City of Harrisburg and Capital Region Water to resolve alleged Clean Water Act violations involving sewer overflows and discharges of polluted stormwater to the Susquehanna River and Paxton Creek.
- Date and time
- 01:59, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
- Not a false positive, please do not insert emojis. Additionally, you appear to be trying to use the article as a WP:COATRACK, which is an issue unrelated to the edit filter, but still a matter of concern. Acroterion (talk) 02:02, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Mobigrid1
- Username
- Mobigrid1 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- Jewish Voice for Labour (filter log)
- Description
- Jewish Voice for Labour
- Date and time
- 12:09, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
Reverting an edit, and adding a citation.
- Please see the concerns that were raised with this edit on my talk page. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 02:29, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
GregxHelton
- Username
- GregxHelton (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- Glossary of craps terms (filter log)
- Description
- I attempted to add the term eighter From Decatur to the glossary of craps terms
- Date and time
- 05:45, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
@GregxHelton: I'm extremely reluctant to add an unsourced entry to this list, even though (for some reason) literally the entire list is unsourced. Do you think you could provide me a source for yours? Thanks. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 02:31, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
92.243.231.132
- Username
- 92.243.231.132 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- Page not specified
- Description
- Date and time
- 06:28, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
Yusuf Ali Adan— Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.243.231.132 (talk)
- What are you trying to do? Someguy1221 (talk) 07:42, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
122.58.163.64
- Username
- 122.58.163.64 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- Page not specified
- Description
- Date and time
- 11:32, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
I was trying to add the English translation of Urenui, which is 'Big Penis', but I am unable to due to the filter.
- Yeah, sure it does. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 15:04, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
172.90.222.33
- Username
- 172.90.222.33 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- Nick Montfort (filter log)
- Description
- Update the entry to cover past several years, address the template message
- Date and time
- 17:50, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
Edit Done, caused by the heart emoji in one of the titles. Thank you for your contributions! —Compassionate727 (T·C) 18:18, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Alexnally
- Username
- Alexnally (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- 2018 Russia–United States summit (filter log)
- Description
- Add to the background section about the 12 Russia Officer indictments 3 days before the meeting
- Date and time
- 19:37, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
Looks like your edit went through. Home Lander (talk) 20:16, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
2405:204:B188:9582:25CB:3E34:5496:C2BC
- Username
- 2405:204:B188:9582:25CB:3E34:5496:C2BC (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- Page not specified
- Description
- Date and time
- 19:55, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
@Someguy1221: Could you check this one? Home Lander (talk) 20:17, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- He wrote LOL in the edit summary. Someguy1221 (talk) 20:28, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
123.21.27.126
- Username
- 123.21.27.126 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- Page not specified
- Description
- Date and time
- 07:20, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
- Let's see, I definitely wonder why you would trip an edit filter. In all seriousness, it's probably because you tried to delete a bunch of stuff from an article without a reason. (Most users don't have an excuse to mass-delete stuff, unless you're an admin, so why should you do it?) EggRoll97 (talk) 08:38, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
103.224.161.131
- Username
- 103.224.161.131 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- John Marsden (writer) (filter log)
- Description
- add detail
- Date and time
- 03:08, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
- Yeah, you probably tripped this one with all the vandalism about "poop". Probably not a wise idea to do this: [1] EggRoll97 (talk) 09:01, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
89.100.134.114
- Username
- 89.100.134.114 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- Page not specified
- Description
- Margaret Hodge has been reported as calling Jeremy Corbyn 'a fucking antisemite and a racist'. She denies the swearing part but the swearing was widely reported in the media, thus I have included it, but the computer program denied it, incorrectly I feel. As the article refers to her denying swearing already this
A) doesn't make any sense unless you include the swearing b) the article doesn't need any further editing once you include the swearing, as it already includes her denial of doing this.
Ultimately there will be an investigation so leaving what she has been accused of, and her denial, is the only logical way to proceed. The way it the article is now-no swearing and her denial of swearing, makes no sense. Until the investigation is over the accusation should stand as it has been recorded.
In short there has been an accusation (of her swearing and calling him racist), there will be an investigation and ultimately a determination of what she said but till then the accusation must be recorded, not censored.
- Date and time
- 09:52, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
- You didn't seem to add any sources in your disallowed edit. Sources are generally required for all articles, and moreso for BLP (biographies of living persons). If you could list some sources, I'm sure one of the edit filter helpers or edit filter managers would be willing to put the information in. Thanks, EggRoll97 (talk) 10:22, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
176.186.245.230
- Username
- 176.186.245.230 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- Flying monkeys (psychology) (filter log)
- Description
- Adding a link to the Useful idiot article in the See also section.
- Date and time
- 09:33, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
- Done Sorry about that, I think you need autoconfirmed status to bypass the bad word filter. EggRoll97 (talk) 10:26, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- No problem, it's better to risk triggering a few false positives than having to deal with hordes of vandals. Thanks a lot. 176.186.245.230 (talk) 10:49, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
185.92.26.83
- Username
- 185.92.26.83 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- History of male circumcision (filter log)
- Description
- Tried to change the article to use proper semantics instead of common vernacular. It is not technically possible to circumcise a man; he can undergo the procedure of circumcision, in which his penis is circumcised by the cutting the foreskin. For example, instead of saying circumcised men, it would be more proper to say men with circumcised penises or men who have undergone circumcisions.
- Date and time
- 07:07, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
- Filter 384 was the filter you tripped, and one of the words specified does happen to be "penis". (Not actually an edit filter helper, so I'll leave the rest to the actual people working on the filters) EggRoll97 (talk) 09:01, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- Apparently this IP doesn't like using "circumcised" and "uncircumcised" as adjectives for people. Unfortunately, this is considered acceptable in English, so he'll have to put up with it. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 12:56, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
173.3.97.178
- Username
- 173.3.97.178 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- entry about claimed "counterfactual" argument that specially anti-Jewish Nazi gun ownership laws contributed to the Holocaust (filter log)
- Description
- Date and time
- 18:10, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
- Not done Assuming you have sources for this, your user talk page still isn't the place to put this. However, user subpages may be the place for this, or perhaps this should be put onto the talk page for an article related to the issue. EggRoll97 (talk) 23:02, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
65.94.42.168
- Username
- 65.94.42.168 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- M32p (filter log)
- Description
- The symbol for the SUN is an astronomical character and is NOT an Emoji. It is found in Astronomical Literature. The edit filter is clearly wrong about that. (CIRCLE with DOT) is used as the astronomical symbol for the Sun, as found in Solar mass and [1] ETC.
- Date and time
- 10:07, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
- Done Appears to be a constructive change. Sorry for the inconvenience, I've added it to the article. EggRoll97 (talk | contribs) 10:22, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Roxanne.heston
- Username
- Roxanne.heston (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- 80,000 Hours (filter log)
- Description
- Change the location of the organization from Oxford (where they used to be based) to San Francisco (where they are based now). Source: https://80000hours.org/about/contact/
- Date and time
- 21:00, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
@Roxanne.heston: That was an error in the filter yes. It won't happen again if you re-try. Do you have a source for the change though? Their web page doesn't specifically say but has a lot of mentions to Oxford. CrowCaw 21:21, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Jiannajustice
- Username
- Jiannajustice (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- Mid-90s (filter log)
- Description
- I need to change the name Olan Prenatt to read Olan Prenatt as Fuckshit, since that is his character's name in the film
- Date and time
- 15:28, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
-
- Do you have a source for this? The closest thing I can find to an official cast list doesn't even have him in the film, much less with that name. CrowCaw 21:29, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
2600:1700:3361:3430:31F9:AF7F:E60:4FEB
- Username
- 2600:1700:3361:3430:31F9:AF7F:E60:4FEB (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- Ionq (filter log)
- Description
- insert penis pic
- Date and time
- 15:49, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
Working as intended. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 23:06, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
123.201.98.36
- Username
- 123.201.98.36 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- Human vaginal size (filter log)
- Description
- I was trying to add an image to this article (File:Shaved Vulva.JPG), and also trying to add a related link (Human penis size) in 'See also' section.
- Date and time
- 15:50, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
So, I'm not really convinced that an imagine of a vagina without any further context or content serves to actually illustrate the article in any way. Also, we don't typically include links in the See also section when they are already present in the article (Human penis size is linked to in the lead). —Compassionate727 (T·C) 23:10, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
2A02:C7D:B7D5:C800:9DEC:25C6:C90D:4F9B
- Username
- 2A02:C7D:B7D5:C800:9DEC:25C6:C90D:4F9B (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- 2017 Russian Grand Prix (filter log)
- Description
- I was trying to say that it was stroll's fault for causing a collision with sainz in bahrain.
- Date and time
- 17:48, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
That is both unsourced an exact contradiction of what the sourced statement in front of it implies. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 23:18, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
174.198.4.207
- Username
- 174.198.4.207 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- Tim Ryan (politician) (filter log)
- Description
- correcting congress param of CongLinks template in EL to fix redirect (www.congress.gov now using same ids as bioguide.congress.gov)
- Date and time
- 08:35, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
- Declined You never tripped a filter, and editing this page was your first edit. Please don't report false positives unless you actually tripped a filter and got a message in response. EggRoll97 (talk | contribs) 09:03, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- @EggRoll97: Just so you're aware, things like this usually happen due to a dynamic IP address changing between the time the editor attempted the edit and when they went to report it. In this case you can assume 2600:1008:b152:664b:8c2a:6212:4e4b:c2f2 and this IP are the same person. Also, IP, I made the edit for you. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 23:04, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Compassionate727: Sorry about that. Forgot the whole dynamic IP thing. EggRoll97 (talk | contribs) 00:11, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
- @EggRoll97: Just so you're aware, things like this usually happen due to a dynamic IP address changing between the time the editor attempted the edit and when they went to report it. In this case you can assume 2600:1008:b152:664b:8c2a:6212:4e4b:c2f2 and this IP are the same person. Also, IP, I made the edit for you. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 23:04, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
90.152.1.11
- Username
- 90.152.1.11 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- List of Royal Variety Performances (filter log)
- Description
- Adding Tony Crapsmith to list of performers, as per IMDB listing.
- Date and time
- 15:26, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
Well, IMDb doesn't fly with our reliable sources policy. Can you provide another source? —Compassionate727 (T·C) 23:05, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- Even in the actual charity website, the performers list doesn't include this person. Obviously IMDb was tricked or vandalized. [1] In fact, there is no mention of a "Tony" at all in the page for that year's performance. EggRoll97 (talk | contribs) 00:20, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
No, although not included on the Royal Variety Charity site, Tony did perform and is clearly visible in videos. Understand the scepticism given his unfortunate name.
DoctorSpeed
- Username
- DoctorSpeed (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- Translation Page Missing in English (filter log)
- Description
- I was translating a page, added copious references and abundant links, however my publishing of this page was blocked under a very broken infobox informing me and I quote "
".<img alt="Your action has triggered the Edit Filter" src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7f/Dialog-error.svg/60px-Dialog-error.svg.png" title="Your action has triggered the Edit Filter" width="60" height="60" srcset="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7f/Dialog-error.svg/90px-Dialog-error.svg.png 1.5x, //upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7f/Dialog-error.svg/120px-Dialog-error.svg.png 2x" data-file-width="48" data-file-height="48" /> An automated filter has identified this edit as potentially unconstructive, so it has been disallowed. If this edit is constructive, please <a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:Edit_filter/False_positives" title="Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives">report this error</a>. Disruptive editing may result in a <a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:Blocking_policy" title="Wikipedia:Blocking policy">block from editing</a>.
Anywho, this is the second time this has happened after I spent quite a copious deal of time translating some pages into English. Thank you! Additional note: Just to experiment, I tried publishing some other translation articles as well. Not allowed.
- Date and time
- 18:23, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
@DoctorSpeed: I could use some additional information. First things first, were you using the Content Translation tool to perform this edit? —Compassionate727 (T·C) 23:28, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Compassionate727: Yes, I was. I have been using it for the past six months now, and I published around 10 translated articles, with my latest successful publish being a week ago. DoctorSpeed (talk) 00:38, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
- @DoctorSpeed: So, there's a number of weird things happening here. I'm not sure why you have been allowed to use Content Translation tool in the past; you aren't supposed to be able to (you can read about that here). I can only assume it worked in the past because the filter uses the edit summary to detect the use of the tool, so if you changed the edit summary, the filter wouldn't have tripped. I don't know why you got the borked warning message that you did; the message is supposed to be mediawiki:abusefilter-warning-cx, and that's what loads when you hit the preview message button in the filter. Furthermore, when I look at your history in the abuse logs, there are several instances when it says that this filter merely warned you, when you report being consistently disallowed (which is what its supposed to do) and the filter has been in disallow for many months. Pinging to MusikAnimal because he does most of the stuff with this filter and he's smarter than me. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 02:55, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
- Actually, MusikAnimal has done a couple of things and Xaosflux has done most of it (plus he's also smarter than me), so pinging to him too. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 03:03, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
- The filter is set to both warn and disallow, this way we can put up a custom warning on the first attempt. So when it says "warn" in the logs it still stopped the edit. Going by tags, DoctorSpeed has only made one use of the Content Translation tool here on the English Wikipedia, and the filter would have matched that except that it was used to edit a page, not create a new one (as with
old_size == 0
) — MusikAnimal talk 03:56, 25 July 2018 (UTC) - So this is not a FP, as WP:CXT is supposed to be blocked for editors that are not extendedconfirmed, as MA says it is based on edit summary as the primary catch - it also only triggers on "new pages" as of about a year ago when MusikAnimal modified it, and only triggers in article space. So use to clobber an existing article appears allowed (and was done once by this user). Bottom line, not a false positive. However, I'm a bit interested in the error message being poorly displayed - what editor and device type were being used? — xaosflux Talk 11:31, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Xaosflux: Can't say. However this account has been buggy since I registered. For instance, every time I log on I get notifications informing me that someone broke into my account or repeated failed attempts to enter into my account, however I see no activity on my account since the last time I logged on (it was not me). Additionally, I have published a few other translations as well. It is strange to see that it does not come into my history, however the article does in fact exist. It might just be a bug. Case closed! DoctorSpeed (talk) 17:21, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
- The filter is set to both warn and disallow, this way we can put up a custom warning on the first attempt. So when it says "warn" in the logs it still stopped the edit. Going by tags, DoctorSpeed has only made one use of the Content Translation tool here on the English Wikipedia, and the filter would have matched that except that it was used to edit a page, not create a new one (as with
- Actually, MusikAnimal has done a couple of things and Xaosflux has done most of it (plus he's also smarter than me), so pinging to him too. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 03:03, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
- @DoctorSpeed: So, there's a number of weird things happening here. I'm not sure why you have been allowed to use Content Translation tool in the past; you aren't supposed to be able to (you can read about that here). I can only assume it worked in the past because the filter uses the edit summary to detect the use of the tool, so if you changed the edit summary, the filter wouldn't have tripped. I don't know why you got the borked warning message that you did; the message is supposed to be mediawiki:abusefilter-warning-cx, and that's what loads when you hit the preview message button in the filter. Furthermore, when I look at your history in the abuse logs, there are several instances when it says that this filter merely warned you, when you report being consistently disallowed (which is what its supposed to do) and the filter has been in disallow for many months. Pinging to MusikAnimal because he does most of the stuff with this filter and he's smarter than me. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 02:55, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Dylanmagierek
- Username
- Dylanmagierek (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- Badman Recording Co. (filter log)
- Description
- I added a band to our roster. I changed our distributor from our old one (RED Distribution) to our current one (Amped) and changed the old spelling of the band Starfucker to their updated spelling of STRFKR. I am the owner of Badman Recording Co.
- Date and time
- 00:03, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
- @Dylanmagierek:Due to the fact that everyone on Wikipedia is anonymous, it is near impossible to prove that you are the owner of this recording company. Do you have any outside sources to confirm the name changes? EggRoll97 (talk | contribs) 00:17, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
65.29.132.180
- Username
- 65.29.132.180 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- Page not specified
- Description
- Date and time
- 22:49, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
- Not done You made an obvious violation of neutral point of view policy (NPOV) and provided no sources to support the other wording provided claiming the person was a "pedophile". EggRoll97 (talk | contribs) 00:19, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
Historical Memes
- Username
- Historical Memes (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- Shrek Franchise (filter log)
- Description
- Hi, I was editing the Shrek Franchise page, and adding how Shrek became Popculture and how it has spread through the internet and the memes and jokes. And why this movie is generally disliked. Of course, since I was writing about dank memes. There was no way it would get through the spam and troll filter. And it got blocked, I would like to request that you please unblock this upload! Thanks a lot!
- Date and time
- 19:29, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
- @Historical Memes: No. Ian.thomson (talk) 19:32, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
{{subst:Rap Chart Mike}}
- Username
- [[User:{{subst:Rap Chart Mike}}|{{subst:Rap Chart Mike}}]] ([[User talk:{{subst:Rap Chart Mike}}|talk]] · [[Special:Contribs/{{subst:Rap Chart Mike}}|contribs]]) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- Vision (spirituality) (filter log)
- Description
- I was adding a bunch of citations and some content in the form of a mass paste in. So I'm actually not sure what triggered the filter (probably the pages where I cite the bible passages?) and I've never seen this before so I thought it would be useful to report it since I was shown the option and learn what source got flagged and possibly get an error corrected.
- Date and time
- 19:52, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
@Rap Chart Mike: It was the book that Lulu published. May I be nosy and ask why you copy-pasted a bunch of text in? —Compassionate727 (T·C) 20:57, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up on that source. I'll find a better one today
- As far as why paste in en masse? Sometimes I edit like that. Only on a pretty inactive page that requires a bunch of work. I find that method for at least the initial edit push is really useful to accelerate my process and lets me work multiple pages at the same time. Sometimes I will chunk it in and sometimes it all goes at once, really depends on what I'm working. There was an ANI related to me doing it and the administrators involved concurred that as long as the attribution chain was intact it is an acceptable practice and they used to encourage people to edit in that fashion. It has seemed atypical to a lot of other editors though. Smaller edits and more active pages certainly need the more typical treatment to avoid mass reversions due to small errors on my part and reach an appropriate consensus for big changes on contentious or heavily edited stuff. However, in cases like this page where it hasn't been touched in a while and interest seems to be waning slamming a bunch of content in tends to spur others to look at it and make further improvements past what I do. Rap Chart Mike (talk) 12:35, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
- That makes sense, I do it sometimes myself. I was just making sure there weren't any copyvio problems. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 21:59, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
Cohn-jesse
- Username
- Cohn-jesse (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- Maison à cuisine unique (filter log)
- Description
- I was translating this page into English. If I am not yet certified to do so, could someone with that certification please review and post the translation? Thank you!
- Date and time
- 15:12, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
- This looks like a good contribution, mostly just seems to have tripped the filter because of the size. I don't know if there's anything else that affected this filter-tripping, so I'll leave the decision to the edit filter people. EggRoll97 (talk | contribs) 01:05, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Cohn-jesse: You were using the content translation tool, which is disallowed on the English Wikipedia for newer users, basically because they import articles from other Wikipedias, many of whose articles don't meet the English Wikipedia's standards, without cleaning them up. This seems to sort of what happened here, although it's not as bad as some. I've copied your edit to Draft:Single-kitchen building. Finish translating the templates, for one thing, and I have some concerns about the commonness of unsourced statements (I can provide further details if you want me to elaborate). Once you are ready, you should submit to AFC to get the opinions and feedback of an experienced reviewer. Let me know if you have any questions. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 02:09, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Compassionate727: Hello -- there were some areas (e.g., quotations and bibliographic references) that the translation tool wouldn't allow me to edit, for some reason (maybe these are the templates to which you refer?). Wasn't aware that English Wikipedia had different standards than Wikipedia in other languages; I wouldn't mind help going through this and refining it, if you're so inclined!
- @Cohn-jesse: You were using the content translation tool, which is disallowed on the English Wikipedia for newer users, basically because they import articles from other Wikipedias, many of whose articles don't meet the English Wikipedia's standards, without cleaning them up. This seems to sort of what happened here, although it's not as bad as some. I've copied your edit to Draft:Single-kitchen building. Finish translating the templates, for one thing, and I have some concerns about the commonness of unsourced statements (I can provide further details if you want me to elaborate). Once you are ready, you should submit to AFC to get the opinions and feedback of an experienced reviewer. Let me know if you have any questions. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 02:09, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
122.108.141.214
- Username
- 122.108.141.214 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- Pauline Hanson's One Nation (filter log)
- Description
- Add information about the recent conviction of a One Nation staffer.
- Date and time
- 01:35, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
Edit Done. Thank you for your contributions! —Compassionate727 (T·C) 02:18, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
2405:204:830A:A02D:88AD:40A9:8EA9:C1D
- Username
- 2405:204:830A:A02D:88AD:40A9:8EA9:C1D (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- Blood Proteins (filter log)
- Description
- i was trying to add a note to the note section in Wikipedia but the keyboard went berserk and started detonating the keys 'enter' and 'e' on the screen
- Date and time
- 10:54, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
- No false positive: filter worked as expected - TNT 💖 11:09, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Mobigrid1
- Username
- Mobigrid1 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- Jewish Voice for Labour (filter log)
- Description
- Added some links and management info (with improved citations and proper formatting) and also new info on a recent CLP meeting.
- Date and time
- 05:39, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
@Mobigrid1: The sources don't seem to support the content in the membership additions, and Wadsworth is covered earlier in the section, so you should keep that content together. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 02:21, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
WRRE4767
- Username
- WRRE4767 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
- Page you were editing
- (Fuck A) Silver Lining (filter log)
- Description
- Hello, this is RUE4533 and JHHN8878. I apologies, I am very new to wiki editing and I believe my incompetence is what triggered the filter. I don't have any intentions to vandalize. The first time I tried to create this page as RUE I accidentally published a blank page, I believe this is what first triggered the filter because after that anytime I attempted to create the page it wouldn't let me. I thought making a new account (JHHN) would fix this, but the same thing happened again. I then pleaded my case in "False Positives" and people thought that I was creating multiple accounts so that I could vandalize even though they admitted the page looked fine. Someone even outlandishly accused me of posting "Harambe memes" which is not true. I now tried to create the page under a new account because the others were banned. Please look over the page I created, it took me a lot of time, I included legitimate references.
- Date and time
- 19:31, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comments
@WRRE4767: Yeah, this has been a large misunderstanding. I apologize for the confusion, and for the fact that your first two accounts were blocked. You were blocked for using multiple accounts. This isn't in and of itself against Wikipedia's policy, provided you don't use them inappropriately; you can read the details at Wikipedia:Sock puppetry. I myself requested help from the Checkuser who blocked you because I wasn't sure whether this was a case of long-term abuse. It turns out it wasn't. The stuff about vandalism was referring to the filter that prevented you from editing; apparently, there's some ongoing vandalism trend regarding an Internet meme (similar to Harambe) that the filter is designed to prevent. Your edit was fine, and it's tripping of the filter was a false positive. Anyway, I've made the edit for you now. Since your original accounts are banned, your editing with this account technically constitutes block evasion. I'm not going to complain, but if you don't want to run the risk of being blocked again without notice, you should appeal your current blocks. I have asked Bbb23 on his talk page to consider unblocking you; hopefully he will be willing to do this. Because it is a Checkuser block, such things are more difficult to appeal; if he doesn't agree, you'll need to email your appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Provided you are unblocked, you should pick one of these three accounts and use it exclusively going forward. That will help to avoid further problems. Best wishes, —Compassionate727 (T·C) 02:54, 29 July 2018 (UTC)