Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Derfflinger class battlecruisers/archive1

Derfflinger class battlecruisers

4 articles

All four articles have recently passed GA reviews; the three ship and class articles are all pretty comprehensive for this subject. Parsecboy (talk) 10:32, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support - meets the criteria, but I really wish that there was a better picture... —Ed (Talk • Contribs) 03:48, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - agree with Ed above, the photo does leave something to be desired, but that is the only nit I see. -MBK₀₀₄ 04:00, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I know, it's not the greatest photo. There is File:SMS Hindenburg ScapaFlow1919.jpg (which, despite its name is actually Derfflinger), but that's not all that great either. This one would be great, but the license isn't definitively sourced, so I don't think we can use it. Parsecboy (talk) 10:58, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - and in looking into this topic, I found this - very impressive plans! Now all you need to do is get SMS Goeben to GA, and that's the German battlecruisers complete ;) rst20xx (talk) 11:50, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Finishing Goeben only gets a FT on the Moltke class since Parsec would need to write an all-encompassing article or list for the battlecruisers before making one large FT nom with multiple sub-topics. -MBK₀₀₄ 15:48, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - I was actually thinking of doing one for the I Scouting Group (see here), which would leave out Goeben since she was never assigned to the unit. Goeben would fit nicely in a FT that includes SMS Breslau, Pursuit of Goeben and Breslau, and an as of yet unwritten Mediterranean Division article that would tie it all together. Parsecboy (talk) 16:22, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Nice work. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:27, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Great job by Parsecboy. - DSachan (talk) 23:06, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another great Mil. Hist. area article. Staxringold _talk^contribs 11:07, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Close with consensus to promote - rst20xx (talk) 12:51, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]