Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Devil May Cry titles

Devil May Cry titles

edit
Main page Articles
  Devil May Cry (series)   Devil May Cry ·   Devil May Cry 2 ·   Devil May Cry 3: Dante's Awakening ·   Devil May Cry 4

Renominating an old Featured Topic. Gary King (talk) 21:33, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support Good job on getting Devil May Cry 4 to GA. Zginder 2008-07-13T21:43Z (UTC)
    • Clarifying since this is the same topic that was featured before, with an additional article for completeness, to require more would be changing the criteria without changing the words. Zginder 2008-07-14T17:56Z (UTC)
  • Comment - I'm a bit iffy about that definition that excludes music, because while I see what you're saying, I feel more strongly that in-universe or not, as the music still forms part of the game series, then it should be included (unlike the novels/manga/anime which are completely separate works). I don't feel strongly enough to oppose, however, so I'll just abstain from voting - rst20xx (talk) 13:08, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Perhaps the controversy would dissipate if we removed the characters article,so this would be only the games of DMC. Then later, do a supplimentary addition when the music, characters, and any other DMC articles are ready to be added. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 20:20, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments above this were made when Characters in Devil May Cry and Dante (Devil May Cry) were included in the nomination and may not reflect a statement on the current proposed topic. Pagrashtak 15:00, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


  • Oppose as per my understanding of the criteria and per the discussion below at NIN. If, however, I were to IAR and vote for what I felt should be a featured topic this would be one... personally, I'm for a looser version of the criteria but that's a discussion for another time and place. gren グレン 09:37, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I said the above based on my reading of the criteria which I think have serious problems. I think we could do them in a better way with "inclusive" featured topics and "enough articles" featured topics or something. I think the series implies the characters and everything in the series... not just the game articles but I think that makes it overly restrictive. So, I don't like the criteria but I don't think this fits them how they are written now. But, I won't vote on this. gren グレン 00:07, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well do you think it meets the criteria now it's been renamed? rst20xx (talk) 15:53, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]