Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Good log/January 2010

Gorgon class monitors

3 articles

I'm nominating these as a Good Topic as I believe they meet the criteria.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Sturmvogel 66 (talk • contribs) 18:30, 7 January 2010

Support -MBK₀₀₄ 08:52, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nick-D (talk) 09:32, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - fulfills the criteria. —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 02:01, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - rst20xx (talk) 16:30, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support OMT strikes again! Staxringold _talk^contribs 00:08, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Not really, these aren't in the scope of OMT, the only similarities is the contributor and their primary armament. -MBK₀₀₄ 00:42, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Heck, even the guns aren't battleship-sized, just armored cruiser-size!--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:12, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    - That was my mistake, I thought they were at least 10-inchers... -MBK₀₀₄ 01:33, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Ooh, boats. ;) Good work. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:38, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support No real problems here. Jhbuk (talk) 18:26, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Close as consensus to promote - rst20xx (talk) 16:56, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Parks and Recreation (season 1)

Parks and Recreation (season 1)

7 articles

"Pilot"

"Canvassing"

"The Reporter"

"Boys' Club"

"The Banquet"

"Rock Show"

This is a GT candidate. I've been working on Parks and Recreation-related articles for some time now, and all the first season-related articles have now made it to GA, so I think this topic is ready. Thanks! — Hun ter Ka hn 20:47, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Looks good. Pyrrhus16 21:31, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Brilliant work. :) The Flash ^{talk} 23:12, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Nice job. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 16:14, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - rst20xx (talk) 18:25, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support I followed your work, HK, as I worked on P&R's Thursday night companion 30 Rock. Great stuff! Staxringold _talk^contribs 23:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Nice work. -- EA Swyer ^Talk _{Contributions} 22:30, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - never heard of the show but can't fault the topic -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:47, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Close with consensus to promote - rst20xx (talk) 16:34, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confessions on a Dance Floor

Confessions on a Dance Floor

7 articles

"Hung Up"

"Sorry"

"Get Together"

"Jump"

Confessions Tour

The Confessions Tour

I'm nominating these seven articles for Good topic as i believe they are comprehensive and denotes the best in Wikipedia. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 12:24, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Well done. Pyrrhus16 18:59, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - this is a very good topic, I find the inclusion of the tour and live album particularly impressive, with the former being an unprecedented move - rst20xx (talk) 14:15, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Actually I do have one question. What's the Confessions Remixed album listed here? As a limited release I doubt it merits its own article, but I think details of it, such as release details, album artwork and tracklisting, should be added to the Confessions on a Dance Floor article - rst20xx (talk) 14:28, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Good point. However, there is absolutely no commentary available at all for the album. Just says that it was released as a promotional remix album and that's it. I don't think for these two lines it warranties an inclusion of the album artwork, which I may say fails WP:NFCC#8 grossly. However, I'll merge these two lines in the article. By the way what did you meant by unprecedented move? :) --Legolas ^(talk2me) 03:35, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK. I just meant that no-one had done it before - rst20xx (talk) 14:27, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Close with consensus to promote - rst20xx (talk) 00:59, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]