Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/1983 Atlantic hurricane season

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was promoted 04:36, 22 January 2008.

---

1983 Atlantic hurricane season

Check external links

I'm nominating this article for featured article because I feel its ready. It passed its Good Article Nomination in February 2007, abandoned for a while, and finished mainly by me in November/December. Its detailed in all sections and apparently the 5th FAC for a Tropical cyclone article.^Mitch32^contribs 02:38, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose: the prose is excellent, but there isn't the bibliography, fundamental for a featured article. --Brískelly 08:57, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

What bibliography's missing, other than not citated link?^Mitch32^contribs 13:53, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Agreed, it has a reference section, which passes FA criterion 2c. --♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:20, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Bibliography... books... ISBN... author... for a major study-depth. When you'll find these things, call me. --Brískelly 17:00, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Brískelly, could you please tell us which one of the Featured article criteria you feel this article does not meet? It's not clear to me (or several others, it seems) to which criterion your statements refer. This may cause your opposition to be judged as inactionable, and therefore invalid according to the instructions at the top of the page. Pagrashtak 21:51, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

I added a Further reading section, if that's what you want. None of my references are books anyway.^Mitch32^contribs 17:16, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

• Contribs. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 04:04, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

• Support Excellent prose. One good thing to see is this has not been hurried, its been worked on slowly. References are great, no reason to oppose. Qst 20:49, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

• Please archive the peer review. --♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 00:36, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Done ^Mitch32^contribs 11:18, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

*Could you please source the following sentence in the predictions section.

"However, the predictions proved to be too high, with only four named storms forming by the end of the season and three of those reaching hurricane status." Seddon69 (talk) 20:29, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

•  Done ^Mitch32^contribs 11:18, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

:Can you go through the article and ensure that all units have metric conversions, and also check for non-breaking spaces. Some examples are:

• "..60 African systems.." things like this needs a non breaking space
• "category 3" needs to have a nb space between the word and the category value Seddon69 (talk) 22:44, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
• Support I believe that this article is ready now for FA. Well written, is well sourced, complies with MOSNUM, Good lead and is a notable season. Seddon69 (talk) 00:51, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
• Comment It looks good for the most part, but what is this? The system that would become Hurricane Alicia originated formed on the western end of a frontal trough that stretched form New England to the Gulf of Mexico. Juliancolton (talk) 22:17, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
• Support It looks good. I can't see anything wrong. Juliancolton (talk) 22:21, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

• Comments
  • Please include a citation in the ACE section for the fact that is the lease active season on record since 1914.

 Done^Mitch32^contribs 15:28, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

• • Newspaper names should be italicized in the references (you can use {{citation|newspaper=}}

 Done^Mitch32^contribs 15:28, 21 January 2008 (UTC) Karanacs (talk) 15:39, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

• Support good article covers the subject in depth and all--Phoenix-wiki 21:06, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.