Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/2004–05 Gillingham F.C. season/archive1

2004–05 Gillingham F.C. season

Featured article candidates/2004–05 Gillingham F.C. season/archive1

Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:03, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm back again with yet another article on a season in the history of Gillingham F.C. This season was, frankly, absolutely bloody awful, and writing about it brought back a lot of bad memories, so hopefully I can get a bronze star to offset my trauma ;-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:03, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Images are appropriately licensed. Nikkimaria (talk) 05:58, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Eric Idle's Cat

Hi Chris, funnily enough I was at that Forest game with a Forest-supporting friend of mine and we were talking about it only this week. I have a couple of minor points.

In Background and pre-season: "they finished in 21st place, level on points with 22nd-placed Walsall and avoiding relegation to the third tier only because their goal difference of -19 was one better than Walsall's -20." – should this be either "avoided" or "Walsall, avoiding…"?
In footnote 55, "Sunday" and "Telegraph" need separating. Eric Idle's Cat (talk) 11:20, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Eric Idle's Cat: - thanks for the review, both points addressed. As I recall (and it's a hazy memory, given that it was nearly 20 years ago) I sat about two rows from the front of the away end at that game, it poured with rain, and the roof didn't cover right to the front so I got soaked in addition to seeing my team get relegated....... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:11, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support - good work, as always. Eric Idle's Cat (talk) 18:00, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

750h

Will review. 750 h+ 12:45, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]