Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Billy Bates (baseball)/archive2

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was archived by Ian Rose via FACBot (talk) 29 January 2021 [1].


Nominator(s): Therapyisgood (talk) 14:50, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about Billy Bates, who scored the winning run in Game 2 of the 1990 World Series. After scoring his run, he never played in Major League Baseball again. Also, he raced against an unchained cheetah and won. Therapyisgood (talk) 14:50, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Hog Farm

edit

I'll try to take a look at this soon. Might be claimed for WikiCup points. Hog Farm Talk 19:57, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's a first look. I'll give it another read-through soon. Hog Farm Talk 15:44, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this article meets 1b or 1c of WP:FACR - there just seems to be an excessive focus on Bates' surroundings and not on Bates himself. There are also further available web sources that contain details about Bates himself not found in here. See [2], [3] has a couple details, [4] says that his name appears in the UT Longhorns baseball records books 32 times and gives some examples, when we're given basically nothing about his college career besides an overview of what the Longhorns did in the '83 CWS. These are just a few example sources; I didn't have to look very hard online to find them.

Oppose on 1b and 1c and suggest withdrawal. It doesn't seem like recent sourcing has been particularly stoutly perused, and there are many places in the article where the article omits details about Bates and often focuses more on Bates' surroundings than Bates himself. I'd recommend taking this to WP:Peer review. Hog Farm Talk 16:04, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hog Farm, I did spot this earlier but the nominator was in the middle of responding so I thought I'd give them that chance -- do you still recommend withdrawal? Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 09:57, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ian Rose: - I'm indifferent to withdrawal at this point, but my oppose still stands. The issues with the big chunks of off-topic have been mainly resolved, it looks, like, but I'm still concerned about other elements. This article is not comprehensive. Another relevant source with more details [5] - he was apparently a hero of a college world series game. Or this, which talks about him a good deal. Given that I'm finding these sources and extra detail in a matter that's not difficult, I don't think this article is comprehensive, thoroughly sourced, or was really quite ready for FAC. I'll leave it up to the FAC coords to determine if this is an actionable oppose or not, but I don't think this one is ready. I think the work to get it ready is doable and shouldn't be hard, but I'm not sure that FAC is the best place for that work to be done. Hog Farm Talk 17:59, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Coord comment -- I am going to archive this and recommend rework take place outside the FAC process, followed by PR, as suggested above. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 22:57, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.