Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Campbell's Soup Cans/archive2

< Wikipedia:Featured article candidates | Campbell's Soup Cans
The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was archived by Gog the Mild via FACBot (talk) 25 September 2023 [1].

Campbell's Soup Cans

edit
Nominator(s): TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 16:54, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about a set of paintings and subsequent variations/derivations by Andy Warhol. This is a seminal piece of art. It is one of 17 paintings listed at vital articles level 4 and one of 10 contemporary art works listed at vital articles level 5. I was the nominator when it previously failed FAC1 on 20 January 2007 and when User:Raul654 relisted the failed nomination which passed on 26 March 2007. It was delisted on 5 March 2021. It seems that there were many citation needed and NFCC issues. I have updated and expanded the article, which now seem fit for relisting.TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 16:54, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FFA (to be updated if re-promoted). SandyGeorgia (Talk) 11:10, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tony. You now need to add this nomination to the top of the list of FACs. Gog the Mild (talk) 00:10, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image review

You are. Feel free to attract the attention of editors who you think may be willing to review - and this is defined fairly broadly - so long as you do so in a neutral manner - which your proposed edit does. Cheers. Gog the Mild (talk) 12:35, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pings:

From Wikipedia:Featured article review/Campbell's Soup Cans/archive1 @SandyGeorgia, Hog Farm, Nikkimaria, Czar, Politicsfan4, DrKay, and Z1720:
From Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Campbell's Soup Cans @Manderiko, AnonEMouse, AaronY, Circeus, Dark Shikari, Raul654, Xyzzy n, Ceoil, 17Drew, SandyGeorgia, Balloonman, Johnbod, Tyrenius, and Michaelas10:
From Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Campbell's Soup Cans/archive1 @GeeJo, Christopher Parham, Tony1, AndyZ, Rlevse, and SandyGeorgia:
Top 10 editors by edits at Talk:Campbell's Soup Cans @Tyrenius, Research Method, MartinGugino, ChrisRuvolo, Modernist, TeeVeeed, Franciselliott, and Wafulz:-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:04, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extending additional invites to the most active editors of the page not listed above @Gkklein, Bus stop, Mandarax, Gurchzilla, and Research Method: for edit count @Dsavla, Simon KHFC, Wehwalt, Wafulz, Lindseytoni, and Gleb95: for text added @TheQuandry, Pauljrmillers, Gkklein, and OckRaz: for characters count added.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 18:27, 20 September 2023 (UTC) That was a typo for User:Mandarax-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 18:38, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose and suggest withdrawal and procedural archive. Before a FAC can proceed, @FAC coordinators: should determine that prior objections have been addressed. Multiple issues previously identified at Wikipedia:Featured article review/Campbell's Soup Cans/archive1 were not addressed before this nomination, including:

  • The issue of non-free images (the subject of a lengthy discussion above)
  • A commercial source (Sotheby's) used to cite commentary and price when it had the items for sale (not indeependent,and also see WP:NOTPRICE, WP:NOTCATALOG [2])
  • Unattributed opinion throughout, see the oddly labeled section, "Messages" for example
  • Uncited text was also raised at FAR: see "The" Premiere section (a section heading which breaches MOS)
  • MOS review needed (this was raised at FAR). Examples, the text refers to image placement throughout (see image above, image to the right). Inconsistent citation formatting still (eg what is the author name format). Page numbers on books missing on multiple.

In addition to those previously raised, unaddressed issues:

  • Odd unencyclopedic section headings: Message, Conclusion ?? Ampersand for "and" in a section heading ? "The" Premiere.

I suggest a well-attended peer review before this article returns to FAC. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 11:08, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • I agree with Sandy. This is clearly not yet ready for FAC and so I am archiving it. The usual two-week hiatus will apply. As well as PR - as Sandy suggests, a well-attended one would be best - a trip through GoCE may help.
  • Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FAC/ar, and leave the {{featured article candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Gog the Mild (talk) 11:17, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Campbell%27s_Soup_Cans/archive2&oldid=1177016571"