Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Erin Phillips/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was promoted by Ealdgyth via FACBot (talk) 7 July 2020 [1].


Nominator(s): Sportsfan77777 (talk) 12:56, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about Erin Phillips, one of the most decorated two-sport athletes in the world. Phillips is a two-time WNBA champion, an Olympic silver medallist, a FIBA World Championship gold medallist, and basketball isn't even her best sport. Phillips is generally considered the best women's Australian rules football player in the world, having run away with the league MVP award (the AFLW best and fairest award) twice in her first three seasons.

If promoted, this would be the first FA for a women's basketball player (and ninth overall among basketball players in general). It would also be the first FA for a women's Australian rules footballer (and third overall among Australian rules footballers in general). Sportsfan77777 (talk) 12:56, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Teratix

edit

Excited to see some women's Australian football content up for FA, and a very fitting choice of subject! Just starting with some comments on the text up to the end of her basketball career, but I'll follow up with a fuller review of the AFLW content references, images etc.

Looks great so far. – Teratix 14:03, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tera, did you want to revisit in light of the responses to your comments? Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 06:46, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies, I've been a bit busy offwiki recently and wanted to wait until I had the time to complete a full review. – Teratix 14:23, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On to the Australian rules football section:

References:

That's all I've got, no major issues as far as I can see. Again, apologies for the delay in reviewing. – Teratix 14:23, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments Support from Cas Liber

edit

Taking a look now....I made these changes. Otherwise looking good in comprehensiveness and prose. Support from me. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:47, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support from Hawkeye7

edit

I reviewed this article at GA, and support its promotion to featured status.

Image review
edit
All images are appropriately licensed. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:08, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Source review
edit
Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:08, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Coord note

edit

@Teratix and Hawkeye7: - are you both satisfied with the corrections made? --Ealdgyth (talk) 14:22, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Factfanatic1

edit

Hello @Sportsfan77777: I was looking through the FA noms/candidates and saw this article. I noticed that many of the references were not archived so I went ahead and archived 134 of the references, which should be most to all of them. By doing this, in case any of the articles are removed by the website or otherwise become dead, they'll always be available since they're archived. I'm quite busy so I most likely won't not do a full review but I will try to at least review your prose and sources. I did do a quick skim and things do look good though. Good luck! Factfanatic1 (talk) 23:13, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.