Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Fight Club (film)/archive1

Fight Club (film)

This was a very helpful and comprehensive article. I feel it would make a good feature article due to it's completeness. Webster100 15:57, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Object - good article but confusing. --GoOdCoNtEnT 17:00, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Object. At the very least, this cannot be a FA because it:

Fails 2a - about half of the article is taken up by lists, rather than prose; this includes a gigantic trivia section. The plot section is currently tagged with Template:Confusing, as well.

Fails 2c - a total of two footnotes is insufficient.

Fails 3a - lead is far too short. --Amuck 17:03, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Object. agree with amuck.Rlevse 18:01, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Object. The plot section has a confusing tag, there are too many lists, and the pictures do not have fair use rationales written for them. -- Underneath-it-All 18:42, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object as per Amuck. -- LGagnon 04:48, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object the article needs clarification, and the lists should be converted to prose. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 17:13, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object as per the reasons stated by Amuck. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 20:07, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]