Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Henry Fonda/review
Self-nomination. I felt that the number of votes was inadequate, so I wanted to renominate it to collect more votes. - A Link to the Past (talk) 00:09, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
Support, excellent article, well-written, informative. Babajobu 00:26, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
- ??? This is already a featured article. Please withdraw this, this...what exactly is this? Harro5 00:41, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
- An attempt at making a clearer FAC. While it succeeded, it only had three votes, and that's not enough to make a decision! - A Link to the Past (talk) 00:47, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
- What do you intend to have happen if it fails FAC this time around? Remove its FA status? If so, then it seems you should list this on Wikipedia:Featured article removal candidates instead, since that's basically what you are doing. If not, then this is a waste of time, right? —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 01:05, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
- But I don't WANT it removed, I want more people to vote on it. If it loses, then it shouldn't have won in the first place, should it? I'm arguing that it had inadequate votes to win. I think it's a great article, but I want confirmation. - A Link to the Past (talk) 02:03, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
- Support looks tidy enough. I only give my opinion when people advertise anyway O:-) Kim Bruning 02:12, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
- Support --Phroziac(talk) 04:00, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
- Support - well written, referenced, &c. --Oldak Quill 04:08, 18 November 2005 (UTC)